Skip to content
Prof. Dr. Mustafa Özdoğan · Medical Oncologist
Contact+90 (538) 677 60 18

CRISPR in Oncology: From the Era of FIXING ERRORS to the Era of DESTROYING FAULTY CELLS

CRISPR in Oncology: From the Era of FIXING ERRORS to the Era of DESTROYING FAULTY CELLS
In this article

RNA-Triggered Cell Destruction with Cas12a2 — First Preclinical Evidence for KRAS G12C and HPV from Nature 2026

CRISPRhas, until now, largely been positioned in oncology as a correction tool: cutting a faulty gene, making a single-base change, or silencing transcription. Cas9 and Cas12a cut the DNA they target, after which cellular repair mechanisms (NHEJ or HDR) close the cut — so the target cell usually survives. Cas13, meanwhile, cleaves RNA but does not trigger lasting cell death in human cells. On 6 May 2026, Naturepublished a study thatadds the missing third capability to the CRISPR toolbox: destroying a cell from within when it detects a particular RNA signal. As soon as the Cas12a2 nuclease base-pairs with its target RNA, it indiscriminately cleaves double-stranded DNA across the entire genome; the result is severe DNA damage, cell-cycle arrest, and apoptosis. The study demonstrates this mechanism in three oncological scenarios: destruction of HPV-infected cells, improvement of gene-editing efficiency, and selective killing of lung cancer cells carrying the KRAS G12C point mutation — even cells that have acquired resistance to sotorasib.
— THE MECHANISM YOU NEED TO KNOW —

An RNA-triggered, indiscriminate DNA shredder: what is Cas12a2?

Cas12a2 is a new clade of Type V CRISPR nucleases identified in 2023 from Sulfuricurvum and metagenomic sources. Its fundamental shared feature with earlier generations of CRISPR enzymes is being RNA-guided — that is, a short guide RNA (gRNA) directs it to a specific nucleotide sequence. Its distinguishing feature is its behavior after finding its target. The guide RNA of Cas12a2 recognizes its target RNA through ribonucleotide, not ribosomal, pairing; it becomes activated in the presence of an adenine-rich motif called the protospacer-flanking sequence (PFS). After activation, the enzyme starts indiscriminately degrading every DNA molecule it encounters — including chromosomal DNA.

The study describes this behavior as "indiscriminate dsDNase activity": shredding double-stranded DNA. This feature of Cas12a2 had already been shown to be a defense mechanism in bacteria (halting the bacterium during phage infection). What is now demonstrated is more critical: the same mechanism is active in human cells too and kills the cell.

≥5,2-fold
increase in 53BP1 foci (a marker of DNA breaks); comparable to cisplatin/etoposide levels
%86
Cell depletion in five days in HeLa-GFP cells with GFP-targeting Cas12a2 RNP
~%40
Proportion of annexin V- and caspase-3/7-positive cells at 48 hours (apoptosis)
800+
Number of differentially expressed genes observed with a targeting guide; "0" with a non-targeting guide
Comparison within the CRISPR Family — Behavior after Target Recognition Cas9 / Cas12a Target: DNA sequence A single, targeted cut ↓ NHEJ / HDR repair THE CELL USUALLY CONTINUES TO LIVE Cas13 Target: RNA sequence Target RNA + neighboring RNA are degraded IN EUKARYOTES NO EFFECTIVE CELL DEATH Cas12a2 (NEW) Target: RNA — Trigger: DNA destruction Target RNA recognition ↓ Genome-wide dsDNA destruction THE TARGET CELL DIES (apoptosis + necrosis) "Correct", "silence", and "destroy" within the same CRISPR family — three different outcomes.
Figure 1. The place of Cas12a2 in the CRISPR family. Cas9 cuts target DNA at a single point, and the cell usually repairs the cut. Cas13 degrades RNA but does not cause effective death in a eukaryotic cell. Cas12a2, by contrast, degrades the entire genome after recognizing target RNA.

WHY DOES THE CELL DIE?

In the study, 24 hours after electroporation of HeLa-GFP cells with Cas12a2-RNP targeting the GFP transcript, nuclear 53BP1 foci (a double-strand break repair protein) increased more than 5-fold . This increase is comparable to that produced by DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics used in oncology, such as cisplatin and etoposide. Cell-cycle analysis found a 2,5-fold decrease in the G1 population and increases in the sub-G1 and >4N (aneuploid) populations — characteristic indicators of mitotic catastrophe and apoptosis. At 48 hours, approximately 40% of cells were positive for annexin V and activated caspase-3/7 (apoptosis), while 20% stained with DAPI (supporting necrosis). RNA-seq showed activation of NLRP3-dependent inflammatory pathways. This multifaceted death profile matters, because the necrosis and inflammation components in particular will stimulate surrounding immune cells and have the potential to "heat up a cold tumor".

— THREE ONCOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS —

1. Selective destruction of HPV-infected cells

The study's first clinical concept is elimination of cells carrying high-risk HPV variants (particularly HPV18 and HPV16). The rationale is this: viral E6 and E7 oncogene transcripts do not naturally occurin the human transcriptome, so a Cas12a2 RNP targeting these transcripts will trigger only the infected cell and will not disturb a healthy cell.

HPV FINDINGS — AT A GLANCE

  • HPV18-positive HeLa-GFP cells: 94% cell reduction by targeting E6 and E7.
  • HPV-negative HEK293-GFP cells: No significant reduction with the same RNPs (evidence of specificity).
  • Single-nucleotide sensitivity: Most single-base mismatches in the guide completely abolish cell killing.
  • In vivo evidence: In a patient-derived xenograft mouse model of HPV16-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), intratumoral administration of LNP-packaged Cas12a2 mRNA + an HPV16 E6 guide significantly slowed tumor growth (n=5 mice/group, 30-day follow-up).

HPV-associated cancers are an invisible burden in global oncology: cervical, anal, vaginal, vulvar cancers, and especially oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), which has increased rapidly over the past 20 years. Today's standard treatment remains surgery, chemoradiotherapy, and immunotherapy added in recent years; however, recurrence is common, and patients are seriously affected by long-term adverse effects. The Cas12a2 approach holds the promise of biomarker-based elimination of residual or recurrent tumor cells that retain viral RNA. German biotechnology company Akribion Therapeutics has taken this enzyme (under the trade name G-dase® E) into clinical development specifically for OPSCC; it emerged from stealth mode in February 2025 with €8 million in seed funding and is at the in vivo proof-of-concept stage.

2. Enrichment of gene-editing efficiency

The study's second application, although not directly affecting clinical oncology, is important for the gene-therapy research infrastructure. In CRISPR editing (for example, somatic correction in BRCA1 carriers or CAR-T engineering), edited cells usually make up only a small part of the population. Cas12a2, using a guide targeting the unedited original transcript, can eliminate unedited cells from the population.

Results: 3,1-fold enrichment for indels produced with FnCas12a; up to 4,3-fold enrichment for single- and double-base mutations produced by prime editing. This is a practical tool for the efficiency bottleneck in CRISPR-based cell therapies.

3. KRAS G12C: cancer cell destruction at single-nucleotide resolution

This is the study's most striking section from an oncology perspective. KRAS G12C is a single-base change (G→T) found in approximately 11–13% of lung adenocarcinomas and a small proportion of colorectal cancers: cysteine replaces glycine at codon 12. Long considered "undruggable", KRAS first became targetable in 2021 with FDA accelerated approval for sotorasib . However, median progression-free survival is only 5–6 months; resistance develops rapidly and has heterogeneous origins (secondary KRAS mutations, EMT, Wnt/β-catenin activation).

The study designed a guide targeting the KRAS G12C transcript while ignoring wild-type (WT) KRAS transcripts. Of three candidate guides, g-KRAS(2) was activated in vitro only by the mutant transcript — no DNA damage occurred with the WT transcript. Results from cell-culture experiments:

%62
Cell reduction with Cas12a2 in KRAS G12C-overexpressing U2OS cells
%0
Significant cell reduction in WT KRAS-overexpressing cells (perfect discrimination)
%50
Reduction in NCI-H23 lung cancer cells carrying native heterozygous G12C
%85+
Total cell reduction with sotorasib (5 µM) + Cas12a2
KRAS G12C-Targeting Cas12a2 — Three Cell Models, Three Outcomes Y-axis: relative cell count compared with a non-targeting guide (%) 0 25 50 75 100 125 NT (100%) ~%100 %38 U2OS WT KRAS / G12C (overexpressed) %50 %35 NCI-H23 Soto / Cas12a2 / Combo (native G12C+/-) %15 %50 %49 %62 Sotorasib-RESISTANT H23 Soto / Cas12a2 / Combo (after acquiring resistance) WT KRAS-targeting G12C-targeting (Cas12a2) Sotorasib or combination
Figure 2. Performance of KRAS G12C-targeting Cas12a2 across three models. In sotorasib-resistant lung cancer cells, Cas12a2 still achieves a 50% reduction; the combined effect reaches 62%.
This technology gives us a powerful tool for eliminating pathological cells in a sequence-specific manner. In this study, we demonstrated its potential in virus-infected cells and cancer cells transformed by point mutations; however, our technology can be programmed to target almost any RNA signature. — Paul Scholz, Akribion Therapeutics, lead author (press release at publication in Nature, May 2026)
SOTORASIB MONOTHERAPY

A 65% reduction in NCI-H23 cells with 5 µM sotorasib. In clinical practice, median PFS is approximately 5–6 months; resistance develops through secondary mutations and Wnt/β-catenin stimulation.

SOTORASIB + Cas12a2

An 85%+ cell reduction with the combination in the same model. Even in the subset of sotorasib-resistant cells, Cas12a2 alone produces a 51% reduction — meaning the target remains accessible as long as the driver mutation is still transcribed as RNA.

Off-target activation: an old concern for a new technology

In conventional CRISPR, the off-target concern is accidentally cutting another genomic region. For Cas12a2, the problem is different: after enzyme activation, the question is not which DNA it cuts, but whether, when activated, it recognizes a transcript the user did not intend . The study examined this issue at three levels:

  • Synthetic mismatch test: Paired mismatches were tested in every region of the 21-nucleotide guide; none produced cell depletion.
  • In silico genome screening: Potential off-target regions were screened with Cas-OFFinder. Of 4 candidate transcripts with two mismatches, only one caused Cas12a2 to become partially activated in vitro — and its expression level in HeLa-GFP cells was almost negligible (1 FPKM).
  • RNA-seq transparency: In cells treated with a non-targeting guide, compared with the vehicle control, not a single gene was differentially expressed. By contrast, the targeting guide affected more than 800 genes.
The Turkish perspective. Sotorasib (Lumakras®) is not covered by SGK in Türkiye; it can be accessed with an individual-use authorization (Regulation on the Procurement of Medicines from Abroad). The situation is similar for adagrasib. KRAS G12C is expected in approximately 11–13% of patients with NSCLC (non-small cell lung cancer) in Türkiye; after treatment resistance, this group often has to return to docetaxel. Unfortunately, RNA-triggered technologies such as Cas12a2 should not be expected to enter clinical practice in the short term; even the most optimistic estimates point to clinical trials opening after 2030 (Akribion Therapeutics: seed funding in February 2025, in vivo proof-of-concept stage, and a goal of entering the clinic within 5 years).
An important limitation. All data in this study are preclinical. Cell cultures and mouse xenograft models incompletely represent the complexity of a patient's tumor; in particular, in vivo distribution, immune responses, target specificity of lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery, and systemic toxicity remain unanswered questions. Cas12a2 was given to mouse tumors by intratumoral injection; systemic delivery remains an open problem. The enzyme's degradation behavior is also irreversible; once a cell is activated, the process cannot be stopped. This makes biomarker selection critical for correct triggering.
— IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE —

This study has no short-term clinical impact; no patient will be treated with Cas12a2 in the coming years. However, its medium- to long-term implications can be considered at three levels:

First, a new tool for biomarker-based oncology. Today, we mostly use biomarkers for treatment eligibility : sotorasib if KRAS G12C is present, osimertinib if EGFR Δ19 is present, and a PARP inhibitor if BRCA is present. In the Cas12a2 paradigm, the biomarker instead becomes a direct trigger for killing — the biomarker both sets the direction and fires the weapon. This matters in scenarios where small-molecule targets are considered "undruggable" or resistance has developed.

Second, combination strategies. The study's most practical finding is that Cas12a2 remains active despite acquired resistance to sotorasib. This suggests a scenario beyond modern oncology's logic of "sequential monotherapy": a small molecule and RNA-triggered destruction could be given simultaneously, eliminating resistant subpopulations at the outset. However, this proposal is purely hypothetical and still far from clinical trials.

Third, in HPV-positive cancers. OPSCC has increased rapidly over the past 20 years; the scale of this increase is not yet clear in Türkiye, but clinical observation at centers such as Memorial shows a well-known year-on-year rise in HPV+ head and neck cases. Akribion's choice of HPV-induced OPSCC as the first target in its clinical development pipeline is strategic in this respect.

— LIMITATIONS —
  • Zero clinical data. All results are from in vitro experiments and mice. There are no patient data.
  • The delivery problem. Cas12a2 was delivered by electroporation or intratumoral LNP. Systemic IV delivery, target-specific tropism, and long-term safety have not been demonstrated.
  • Scenarios involving more than one dose. The immune system may develop antibodies against bacterially derived Cas12a2; humanized/ML-designed variants will be needed for repeat-dose scenarios.
  • Off-target screening is not yet mature. Methods established for Cas9, such as GUIDE-seq and CIRCLE-seq, cannot be applied directly; dedicated off-target mapping tools for Cas12a2 need to be developed.
  • Single-cell heterogeneity. In the study, the KRAS G12C-overexpressing U2OS model shows 62% destruction, but native heterozygous NCI-H23 shows 50%; low transcript levels may not fully activate Cas12a2, creating a risk of reduced efficacy in tumors with low target-gene expression.
⚡ DROZDOGAN ACADEMY — CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
⚡ WHY DOES IT MATTER?

CRISPR-Cas9 and Cas12a have developed as therapeutic editing tools over the past decade — the first clinical approvals came in sickle cell anemia and β-thalassemia. In oncology, however, CRISPR's role remained limited: either as an instrument in CAR-T production or in highly specific scenarios (such as targeting repetitive DNA elements). Cas12a2 adds a new capability to this equation: destroying a cell from within when it detects a specific RNA signature. If point mutations such as KRAS, NRAS, IDH1 R132H, and EGFR T790M can be recognized at the RNA level with single-base resolution, the "undruggable" list could become substantially shorter.

✅ STRENGTHS / EVIDENCE

The study is methodologically comprehensive: testing in seven different human cell lines (HeLa, HEK293, COR-L23, SCC-4, SK-MEL-30, U2OS, NCI-H23); demonstration of two delivery modes (RNP electroporation and LNP-packaged mRNA); evidence of tumor shrinkage in an in vivo HPV+ HNSCC xenograft model; and confirmation of single-nucleotide sensitivity with the g-KRAS(2) guide (WT versus G12C discrimination: 0% versus 62%). RNA-seq reveals no detectable trace of off-target activation. Its activity in sotorasib-resistant cells is also a strong mechanistic test.

⚠️ LIMITATIONS

There are no clinical data. In vivo delivery is intratumoral; systemic tropism is unknown. Tumor-specific targeting of LNPs is itself a research field. Cas12a2 may be immunogenic; the effect of neutralizing antibodies in repeat-dose scenarios is uncertain. Activation may be insufficient in tumors with low transcript levels. Irreversible activation requires zero tolerance for off-target risk; preclinical off-target screening methods are still not mature.

🩺 IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Memorial, Acıbadem, Anadolu Sağlık, and other major Turkish centers use sotorasib or adagrasib for KRAS G12C under individual-use authorizations; response duration is limited, and resistance develops quickly. The Cas12a2 approach will not enter clinical practice in the short term — but centers in Türkiye could be partners when companies such as Akribion open clinical trials (around after 2030). The increase in HPV-positive OPSCC in Türkiye is real; infrastructure for screening, NGS-based typing, and establishing viral RNA biomarker panels will be needed. KETEM screening programs and Ministry of Health policies should be updated accordingly.

❓ QUESTIONS FOR THE FUTURE

Which LNP formulation provides target-specific systemic delivery? How can immune responses be managed in repeat-dose scenarios? Can the PFS requirement be relaxed to allow a broader range of targets? Does Cas12a2 activation create surrounding immune stimulation in the tumor microenvironment (a "cold → hot tumor" transition)? A strategy targeting one mutation amid clonal heterogeneity, or targeting multiple mutations simultaneously? How should a biomarker panel for candidate patients be established? Should the first clinical trial focus on OPSCC, KRAS G12C+ lung cancer, or pediatric solid tumors?

References

  1. Scholz P, Thompson J, Crosby KT, et al. RNA-triggered cell killing with CRISPR-Cas12a2. Nature 6 May 2026 (online publication). doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10466-y.
  2. Dmytrenko O, Neumann GC, Hallmark T, et al. Cas12a2 elicits abortive infection through RNA-triggered destruction of dsDNA. Nature 2023;613(7945):588–594. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05559-3.
  3. Bravo JPK, Hallmark T, Naegle B, et al. RNA targeting unleashes indiscriminate nuclease activity of CRISPR-Cas12a2. Nature 2023;613(7945):582–587. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05560-w.
  4. Akribion Therapeutics GmbH. Press release: Akribion Therapeutics exits from stealth with €8m seed financing to pioneer RNA-guided, programmable cell depletion. 4 February 2025.
  5. BRAIN Biotech AG. Press release: BRAIN Biotech AG and Akribion Therapeutics GmbH sign exclusive pharma licensing agreement for G-dase® E CRISPR-Cas technology. 31 October 2024 (€92,3 million milestone structure).
  6. Skoulidis F, Li BT, Dy GK, et al. Sotorasib for lung cancers with KRAS p.G12C mutation. N Engl J Med 2021;384(25):2371–2381. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2103695. (CodeBreaK 100 pivotal phase 2)
  7. de Langen AJ, Johnson ML, Mazieres J, et al. Sotorasib versus docetaxel for previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer with KRAS G12C mutation: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023;401(10378):733–746. (CodeBreaK 200)
  8. Nakajima EC, Drezner N, Li X, et al. FDA approval summary: sotorasib for KRAS G12C-mutated metastatic NSCLC. Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(8):1482–1486. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3074.
  9. Mohanty A, Nam A, Pozhitkov A, et al. Acquired resistance to KRAS G12C small-molecule inhibitors via genetic/nongenetic mechanisms in lung cancer. Sci Adv 2023;9(41):eade3816.
  10. Yumuk PF, Akın Telli T, Demirci U, et al. Lung cancer in Turkey. J Thorac Oncol 2023;18(12):1592–1607 (KRAS mutation rate in Türkiye approximately 26%; sotorasib outside SGK coverage).
  11. Anzalone AV, Randolph PB, Davis JR, et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 2019;576(7785):149–157. (foundational prime-editing publication)
  12. Pacesa M, Pelea O, Jinek M. Past, present, and future of CRISPR genome editing technologies. Cell 2024;187(5):1076–1100.
  13. University of Utah Health Newsroom. New kind of CRISPR could treat viral infection and cancer by shredding sick cells' DNA. 7 May 2026.

This article is for medical news/information purposes and does not provide individual treatment guidance. Cas12a2/G-dase E remains at the preclinical research stage; it is not approved for human use and is not expected to enter routine clinical practice in the next few years. Current treatment choices for KRAS G12C-positive lung cancer and HPV-positive head and neck cancers require multidisciplinary tumor-board decisions and comprehensive genomic profiling; access to small-molecule inhibitors (sotorasib, adagrasib) in Türkiye under individual-use authorizations should be considered. Editor's note: this article is based on the study by Scholz and colleagues published on 6 May 2026 in Nature and the simultaneous press releases from University of Utah Health and Akribion Therapeutics.

DROZDOGAN AI

Explore this article together

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

DROZDOGAN AI

Drozdogan Assistant

CRISPR in Oncology: From the Era of FIXING ERRORS to the Era of DESTROYING FAULTY CELLS

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

Conversation and privacy information

Drozdogan Assistant answers this conversation. Authorized site administrators may review it for quality. Do not share personal information.

Replies use OpenAI infrastructure. Questions and replies are processed by that service; conversation records are stored on our site. Do not share identifying, contact or personal health information.

0 / 1000

For information only; no personal diagnosis or treatment advice.

Related articles

Explore other articles on this topic.

Stay informed

Receive new articles and scientific updates by email.

Google Analytics runs on public pages independently of this window and may use analytics cookies. Your choice here controls external services only.

Cookie policy