Stomach Cancer Symptoms, Stages and Treatment – Patient Guide

In this article
What Are Stomach and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer?
Stomach cancer (gastric adenocarcinoma) is a cancer arising from the glandular cells lining the inner surface of the stomach, and accounts for approximately %95 of stomach cancers. Adenocarcinomas developing where the esophagus and stomach meet (gastroesophageal junction, GEJ) belong to the same biological family, but are addressed with their own classification and treatment nuances — this guide covers both comprehensively. The past three years have seen successive new FDA approvals at an unprecedented pace in the treatment of this disease group: new biomarkers (Claudin 18.2), new antibody-drug conjugates, perioperative immunotherapy and, most recently (August 25, 2026), a completely new targeted therapy-immunotherapy combination for HER2-positive disease have been approved. This guide discusses every detail, from the causes and diagnosis of the disease to staging and the most current treatment options.
Three main axes determine the treatment approach in stomach cancer: the tumor's location (gastroesophageal junction or stomach body — distinguished by the "Siewert classification"), its stage (early/resectable or metastatic) and its molecular profile (HER2, Claudin 18.2, microsatellite instability, PD-L1 status). Particularly in metastatic disease, which biomarker is positive now directly determines which drug will be used — therefore, the staging and treatment sections of this guide are structured around this molecular framework.
Stomach Anatomy
The stomach is a digestive organ in the upper abdominal cavity, between the esophagus and the duodenum, the first part of the small intestine. It consists of four main regions: the cardia, where the esophagus opens into the stomach; the dome-shaped fundus above the cardia; the corpus (body), the largest part of the stomach, where food is stored and digested; and the antrum/pylorus, opening into the small intestine.

From inside to outside, the stomach wall consists of the mucosa (the inner lining containing glandular cells — the vast majority of adenocarcinomas start here), submucosa, muscularis propria (muscle layer) and, outermost, the subserosa/serosa layers. This layered structure forms the basis of staging by tumor depth (T category).

While the stomach mechanically mixes food and breaks it into small pieces, it also chemically initiates protein digestion by secreting hydrochloric acid and the enzyme pepsin; its acidic environment also acts as a barrier against harmful microorganisms.
How Common Is It? (Current Statistics)
According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer's (IARC) "Global cancer statistics 2024" report (Sung H, et al., CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, published July 8, 2026, DOI: 10.3322/caac.70090), worldwide data for 2024 reported approximately 980.286 new stomach cancer cases (%4,7 of all cancers — the 5. most common cancer type) and 641.554 deaths due to stomach cancer (%6,6 of cancer deaths — the 5. most common cause of death). The incidence in men is approximately 2,2 times that in women (638.780 male cases versus 341.506 female cases). Approximately %71 of cases occur in Asia, and Mongolia has the world's highest incidence; East Asia, Eastern Europe and parts of South America are also traditionally high-incidence regions.
According to the American Cancer Society's "Cancer Statistics, 2026" report (Siegel RL, et al., CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, published January 13, 2026, DOI: 10.3322/caac.70043), the USA is expected to have, in 2026, approximately 31.510 new stomach cancer cases (17.900 men, 13.610 women) and 10.740 deaths . The median age at diagnosis is 68, and approximately %60 of cases are diagnosed at age 65 or older. Stage-specific 5-year relative survival (SEER 21, 2015-2021 diagnosis cohort): %76,5 for localized disease, %37,2 for regional spread and %7,5 for distant metastasis; approximately %43 for all stages combined. Only %31 of patients are diagnosed at a localized stage, while %36 unfortunately already have distant metastases — clearly showing why early diagnosis is so critical in stomach cancer.
According to the GLOBOCAN 2024 Türkiye country profile, approximately 12.914 new stomach cancer cases (8.481 in men) are reported annually in Türkiye, placing stomach cancer 7. in incidence among all cancers. Strikingly, stomach cancer in Türkiye ranks 3. among causes of death (9.176 deaths) — a death ranking that lags behind its incidence ranking, reflecting the tendency for the disease to be detected at a late stage and its limited survival. Türkiye's stomach cancer burden has historically been considered higher than that of Western European countries; this is largely associated with the widespread prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in the population.

Risk Factors
Helicobacter pylori was classified by IARC in 1994 (IARC Monographs Volume 61) as a definite (Group 1) carcinogen. Current estimates suggest that approximately the following proportion of stomach cancers diagnosed worldwide in 2020 — %78-94 (varying by region, the vast majority of non-cardia [distal] stomach cancers) — is attributable to H. pylori infection (approximately 850.000 cases/year). According to a meta-analysis (Liang JL, et al., Frontiers in Oncology, 2025), people with H. pylori infection have a stomach cancer risk approximately 4,36 times (RR) that of those without it. Eradication of H. pylori infection with antibiotics is a proven strategy for reducing stomach cancer risk.
- Helicobacter pylori infection (the most important risk factor)
- Smoking (RR ~1,61)
- High-salt food consumption (RR ~1,55)
- Processed/red meat consumption
- Low fruit and vegetable consumption
- Chronic atrophic gastritis and pernicious anemia (RR ~6,8)
- Previous gastric surgery (long-term risk of gastric stump cancer)
- Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection (a distinct molecular subtype of stomach cancer)
- Obesity
- Chronic gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) — particularly for cardia/GEJ cancers
Stomach cancer is not a single disease; risk factors differ markedly between cancers in the cardia (gastroesophageal junction) region and those in the stomach body (distal/non-cardia). According to a classic study (Lagergren J, et al., NEJM, 1999), frequent and severe reflux symptoms increase the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma 43,5-fold and cardia adenocarcinoma 4,4-fold — whereas this association has not been demonstrated in distal stomach cancer. Thus, GERD/Barrett's esophagus is mainly associated with cardia/GEJ cancers, while H. pylori is mainly associated with distal stomach cancer; the decline in distal stomach cancer and rise in cardia/GEJ adenocarcinoma in Western countries is largely based on this different risk profile.
Hereditary Stomach Cancer Syndromes
A small proportion of stomach cancers (approximately %1-3) are associated with hereditary syndromes; however, recognizing them is crucial because the risk in these patients is often very high.
According to the International Gastric Cancer Linkage Consortium's (IGCLC) 2020 update (Blair VR, et al., Lancet Oncology, 2020), CDH1 (E-cadherin) germline gene mutations increase the cumulative risk of diffuse-type stomach cancer by age 80 to %42-70 in men and %33-56 in women (the wide range comes from studies with different family selection criteria); female carriers also have a lobular breast cancer risk reaching %39-55. The guideline generally recommends, for carriers meeting appropriate criteria and between ages 20-30, prophylactic (preventive) total gastrectomy .
Lynch syndrome: in MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2 gene carriers, stomach cancer risk by age 70 varies from %2-16 (by gene and sex); Li-Fraumeni syndrome (TP53) has been particularly associated with gastroesophageal junction tumors; in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), fundic gland polyps are common and some may develop dysplasia; in GAPPS (gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach, due to a mutation in the promoter region of the APC gene), a risk of gastric adenocarcinoma has been reported. Genetic counseling and, when needed, germline testing are recommended for patients with a relevant family history.
Histological and Molecular Classification
Lauren Classification: Intestinal and Diffuse Types
Described in 1965 (Laurén P., Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scandinavica, 1965), this classic histological classification divides gastric adenocarcinoma into two main biological behaviors:
| Feature | Intestinal Type | Diffuse Type |
|---|---|---|
| Age/sex | Older, more common in men | Younger, relatively more common in women |
| Associated factor | H. pylori, chronic atrophic gastritis | CDH1/E-cadherin loss of function, hereditary predisposition |
| Growth pattern | A well-defined mass forming glandular structures | Cells that have lost cohesion, a "linitis plastica" (leather bottle stomach) pattern, signet ring cells |
| Tendency to spread | Hematogenous (through the blood) | Peritoneal (abdominal lining) spread is more common |
| Frequency trend | Declining in Western countries | Relatively stable/increasing |
| Prognosis | Relatively better | Worse (HR 1,23; Petrelli F, et al., meta-analysis, J Gastrointest Oncol, 2017) |
TCGA Molecular Subtypes
According to the comprehensive molecular analysis by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) consortium (Nature, 2014), gastric adenocarcinoma is divided into four molecular subtypes: EBV-positive (%9 — associated with Epstein-Barr virus, characterized by high PD-L1 expression), microsatellite unstable (MSI) (%22), genomically stable (%20 — associated with diffuse histology and RHOA mutations) and chromosomally unstable (CIN) (%50 — the most common subtype, associated with amplifications in receptor genes such as HER2). Although this classification matters in research, current clinical treatment decisions rely more on the targetable biomarkers described below.
Adenocarcinomas located at the gastroesophageal junction are divided into three types using the Siewert classification based on the tumor center's position relative to the junction (Siewert JR, Stein HJ, British Journal of Surgery, 1998): Type I — distal esophageal adenocarcinoma, 1-5 cm above the junction (usually developing in the setting of Barrett's esophagus) — treated like esophageal cancer; Type II — "true cardia carcinoma," from 1 cm above to 2 cm below the junction — a boundary region with a debated surgical approach; Type III — subcardial gastric carcinoma, 2-5 cm below the junction, involving the junction from below — treated like stomach cancer. This distinction determines both the surgical approach (esophagectomy or gastrectomy) and which lymph node regions (mediastinal or abdominal) need to be removed.
Symptoms
- Indigestion (dyspepsia) and upper abdominal discomfort
- Difficulty swallowing (particularly in GEJ/cardia tumors)
- Early satiety after eating a small amount of food
- Unexplained weight loss
- Nausea and vomiting
- Anemia (low blood count) and associated fatigue
- Black/tarry stools or occult bleeding (due to chronic blood loss)
- In advanced stages: abdominal swelling (ascites), jaundice, palpable lymph nodes
Early-stage stomach cancer usually causes no obvious symptoms; therefore, it is important to consult a physician promptly when the symptoms above appear — particularly in people over 50, with a history of H. pylori or a family history. These symptoms can also arise from many benign causes other than stomach cancer, but must be assessed for differential diagnosis.
How Is It Diagnosed?
Endoscopy and Biopsy
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosing stomach cancer; a thin, flexible camera directly visualizes the inner surfaces of the stomach, esophagus and duodenum, and suspicious areas undergo biopsy for pathological examination. After the diagnosis is confirmed, a second endoscopy/biopsy may be needed for surgical planning.
Imaging for Staging
Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) (chest, abdomen, pelvis) is the main imaging method for assessing local tumor spread and possible distant metastases. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is more sensitive than CT for assessing tumor depth in the stomach wall (T stage) and surrounding lymph nodes. In suspicious cases, PET-CT may contribute to screening for distant metastases.
For locally advanced patients (T3/T4 or lymph node involvement) with no distant metastases detected on imaging, the recommended procedure before planning curative surgery is diagnostic laparoscopy . In this procedure, the abdominal cavity is directly observed and peritoneal washing fluid is sent for cytological examination — small peritoneal implants or positive cytology missed by CT may change the treatment strategy (for example, directing the patient to systemic therapy), preventing unnecessary major surgery.
Biomarker (Molecular) Tests
Testing four biomarkers that directly guide treatment selection is now considered standard for every patient diagnosed with metastatic stomach/GEJ cancer:
| Biomarker | Test Method | Approximate Frequency | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| HER2 (ERBB2) | Immunohistochemistry (IHC), confirmation by FISH if IHC is 2+ | ~%15-20 | Determines eligibility for HER2-targeted therapies (trastuzumab, trastuzumab deruxtecan, zanidatamab) |
| Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) | IHC (VENTANA CLDN18 [43-14A] RxDx test) | ~%38 (~%42 in HER2-negative tumors) | Determines eligibility for zolbetuximab treatment |
| Microsatellite instability (MSI-H/dMMR) | IHC (MMR proteins) or PCR/NGS-based MSI testing | Variable (more common in early stages) | Possibility of an exceptional response to immunotherapy; may affect the decision on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in some early-stage patients |
| PD-L1 (CPS) | IHC (22C3 or 28-8 clone) | Variable | The approval scope for immunotherapy combinations varies by CPS thresholds (≥1, ≥5, ≥10) |
According to criteria established by the ToGA study, HER2 positivity in stomach cancer is scored differently from breast cancer: because tumor heterogeneity is more common, in biopsy specimens even a cluster of 5 cells with basolateral/incomplete membranous staining is considered positive, whereas in resection specimens the threshold is defined as ≥%10 of tumor cells. This difference arises from the glandular structure of stomach tissue and the heterogeneous pattern of HER2 expression.
Although bemarituzumab, targeting FGFR2b overexpression, met the primary overall survival endpoint in FORTITUDE-101, the final analysis reportedly showed diminished survival benefit and increased ocular toxicity; the manufacturers have postponed regulatory submission until the results of FORTITUDE-102. Thus, bemarituzumab is not an FDA-approved treatment as of the date this guide was prepared and remains investigational.
Staging: The TNM System (AJCC 8. Edition)
Starting in 2024, AJCC began gradually publishing "Version 9." of its staging manual by cancer type; however, apart from neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach, gastric adenocarcinoma is still staged using AJCC 8. edition (2017) — Version 9. has not yet been published for this disease. The table below reflects AJCC 8. edition.

T Category
| T Category | Definition |
|---|---|
| Tis | Carcinoma in situ — intraepithelial tumor without lamina propria invasion (high-grade dysplasia) |
| T1a | Tumor invades the lamina propria or muscularis mucosae |
| T1b | Tumor invades the submucosa |
| T2 | Tumor invades the muscularis propria |
| T3 | Tumor penetrates the subserosal connective tissue without involving the visceral peritoneum or adjacent structures |
| T4a | Tumor invades the serosa (visceral peritoneum) |
| T4b | Tumor invades adjacent structures (spleen, transverse colon, liver, diaphragm, pancreas, abdominal wall, adrenal gland, kidney, small intestine, retroperitoneum) |
N and M Categories
N0: no regional lymph node metastasis. N1: metastases in 1-2 regional lymph nodes. N2: metastases in 3-6 regional lymph nodes. N3a: metastases in 7-15 regional lymph nodes. N3b: metastases in 16 or more regional lymph nodes. M0: no distant metastasis. M1: distant metastasis present (including distant lymph nodes or peritoneal spread).
To determine N stage reliably, the AJCC/UICC TNM system requires removal and pathological examination of at least 16 lymph nodes during surgery; examining too few lymph nodes may lead to understaging the disease. A properly performed D2 lymphadenectomy (discussed below) typically removes far more than this number of lymph nodes (often 25-40+).
Stage Groups
| Stage | TNM |
|---|---|
| 0 | Tis, N0, M0 |
| IA | T1, N0, M0 |
| IB | T1, N1, M0; or T2, N0, M0 |
| IIA | T1, N2, M0; or T2, N1, M0; or T3, N0, M0 |
| IIB | T1, N3a, M0; or T2, N2, M0; or T3, N1, M0; or T4a, N0, M0 |
| IIIA | T2, N3a, M0; or T3, N2, M0; or T4a, N1/N2, M0; or T4b, N0, M0 |
| IIIB | T1/T2, N3b, M0; or T3, N3a, M0; or T4a, N3a, M0; or T4b, N1/N2, M0 |
| IIIC | T3/T4a, N3b, M0; or T4b, N3a/N3b, M0 |
| IV | Any T, any N, M1 |








Treatment Planning: A Multidisciplinary Approach
Stomach/GEJ cancer treatment is planned by a multidisciplinary team of surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, gastroenterologists, pathologists and dietitians. Three main questions determine treatment decisions: (1) Is the tumor resectable (can it be completely removed surgically)? (2) Is the disease localized/locally advanced or metastatic? (3) What is the tumor's HER2, Claudin 18.2, MSI and PD-L1 status ? The answers to these three questions determine the treatment steps discussed in detail below.
Surgical Treatment
Endoscopic Resection: For Very Early Stages
For tumors confined to the most superficial layer of the stomach wall with a very low risk of lymph node involvement (typically T1a, meeting certain size/histology criteria), the tumor can be removed from the stomach wall through an endoscope. Two techniques are used for this: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) and, preferred for larger/deeper lesions, Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD). This approach offers curative treatment while preserving the entire stomach.
Gastrectomy
For most early and locally advanced stomach cancers, standard curative surgery removes the tumor, the diseased part of the stomach and regional lymph nodes (gastrectomy). Depending on tumor location and spread, options include total gastrectomy (the entire stomach), subtotal/partial gastrectomy (part of the stomach, with reconstruction of the digestive tract) or proximal/distal gastrectomy ; surgery can be performed using an open or laparoscopic (minimally invasive) technique.

Lymph Node Dissection: D1 and D2
According to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) classification, lymphadenectomy accompanying gastrectomy is classified by the stations it includes: D1 (perigastric stations), D1+ (stations additional to D1 — used for early-stage tumors not meeting endoscopic resection criteria) and D2 (in addition to D1, includes stations along the left gastric, common hepatic, celiac and splenic arteries). For curative surgery, current NCCN and JGCA guidelines define the standard approach as D2 lymphadenectomy; it should be performed in experienced centers by specialist surgeons.

Palliative Surgical Procedures: Managing Obstruction
In advanced or unresectable disease, if tumor-related gastric outlet obstruction develops, stomach contents can be diverted to the small intestine by gastrojejunostomy (open or laparoscopic). During this procedure, nutritional support may require a tube placed directly into the stomach through the abdominal skin, a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) , or a tube placed in the small intestine, a jejunostomy tube (J-tube) ; today, endoscopic stent placement is also a frequently preferred, less invasive alternative for relieving obstruction.

Systemic Treatment in Early-Stage and Locally Advanced (Resectable) Disease
According to FLOT4 (Al-Batran SE, et al., Lancet, 2019), the combination of 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin and docetaxel, the FLOT regimen , given as perioperative chemotherapy before (neoadjuvant) and after (adjuvant) surgery, significantly prolonged overall survival compared with the former standard ECF/ECX regimen (median 50 months versus 35 months; HR 0,77; p=0,012); 5-year overall survival was %45 versus %36. These results made FLOT the backbone of perioperative chemotherapy in resectable stomach/GEJ adenocarcinoma.
On November 25, 2025, the FDA approved a perioperative regimen adding durvalumab to neoadjuvant/adjuvant FLOT followed by single-agent durvalumab maintenance in resectable stomach/GEJ adenocarcinoma — this is the first perioperative immunotherapy approval in stomach/GEJ cancer. In MATTERHORN, median event-free survival was not reached, compared with 32,8 months in the control arm (HR 0,71; p<0,001); the final overall survival analysis also showed significant benefit (HR 0,78; %95 CI 0,63-0,96; p=0,021); the pathological complete response rate was %19,2 versus %7,2. This approval began a new era in which FLOT can now be combined with immunotherapy.
KEYNOTE-585, investigating the addition of pembrolizumab to perioperative FLOT/chemotherapy, increased the pathological complete response rate but did not show a statistically significant benefit in event-free or overall survival in the final analysis, and this combination did not receive FDA approval. This is an important example showing that immunotherapy combinations do not always provide benefit in the perioperative setting, and that which combination works must be assessed study by study.

Because patients with MSI-high tumors may derive a different degree of benefit from chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is assessed case by case within the multidisciplinary team. Adjuvant radiotherapy (alone or combined with chemotherapy) may also be considered in selected patients with insufficient lymph node removal or inadequately clear surgical margins.
First-Line Treatment in Metastatic Stomach/GEJ Cancer
Treatment selection in metastatic disease is now almost entirely determined by biomarker results. The pathway below directs patients to different treatment arms according to HER2 status, followed by Claudin 18.2 and PD-L1/MSI status.
On August 25, 2026, the FDA approved the combination of the HER2-targeted bispecific antibody zanidatamab (Ziihera) and the PD-1 inhibitor tislelizumab (Tevimbra) in a triple combination with chemotherapy for previously untreated HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/ISH+) unresectable locally advanced/metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (the zanidatamab+chemotherapy combination without tislelizumab was also approved only for IHC 3+ patients). In the phase 3 HERIZON-GEA-01 study, results versus standard trastuzumab+chemotherapy were as follows:
| Treatment Arm | Median PFS | Median OS |
|---|---|---|
| Zanidatamab + tislelizumab + chemotherapy | 12,4 months (HR 0,63; p<0,0001) | 26,4 months (HR 0,72; p=0,0043) |
| Zanidatamab + chemotherapy (IHC 3+ only) | 12,4 months (HR 0,65; p<0,0001) | 24,4 months (HR 0,80; not significant) |
| Trastuzumab + chemotherapy (control arm) | 8,1 months | 19,2 months |
Note: Overall survival benefit was statistically significant only in the triple combination (zanidatamab+tislelizumab+chemotherapy) arm; the rate of grade ≥3 adverse events was higher with the triple combination (%71,8) than in the other two arms (%59,0 and %59,5). This approval was granted only one day before this guide was prepared and is an extremely recent development.
Trastuzumab+chemotherapy has long been standard treatment in HER2-positive metastatic stomach/GEJ cancer, receiving FDA approval on October 20, 2010 based on ToGA (overall survival 13,8 versus 11,1 months; HR ~0,74). Based on KEYNOTE-811, adding pembrolizumab to trastuzumab+chemotherapy in patients with PD-L1 CPS≥1 received full FDA approval on March 19, 2025 (PFS 10,9 versus 7,3 months, HR 0,72; OS 20,1 versus 15,7 months, HR 0,79). Following approval of the zanidatamab+tislelizumab combination, the choice between these two approaches will be shaped by current guidelines.
Zolbetuximab (Vyloy) is the first Claudin 18.2-targeted antibody, receiving FDA approval on October 18, 2024. In SPOTLIGHT (combined with mFOLFOX6), PFS was 10,6 versus 8,7 months (HR 0,751) and OS 18,2 versus 15,5 months (HR 0,750); in GLOW (combined with CAPOX), PFS was 8,2 versus 6,8 months (HR 0,687) and OS 14,4 versus 12,2 months (HR 0,771). This drug is added to chemotherapy in HER2-negative, Claudin 18.2-positive patients (moderate-to-strong membranous staining in ≥%75 of tumor cells by IHC).
Nivolumab was approved with chemotherapy on April 16, 2021 based on CheckMate 649, regardless of PD-L1 status; overall survival in the CPS≥5 subgroup was 14,4 versus 11,1 months (HR 0,71). Pembrolizumab was approved with chemotherapy on November 16, 2023 based on KEYNOTE-859 in previously untreated HER2-negative patients (OS 12,9 versus 11,5 months, HR 0,78; PFS 6,9 versus 5,6 months, HR 0,76). In clinical practice, the choice between these options may vary by PD-L1 CPS level and institutional experience.

Second- and Later-Line Treatment in Metastatic Stomach/GEJ Cancer
Ramucirumab is a monoclonal antibody blocking VEGFR2 (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2). It received FDA approval as a single agent on April 21, 2014 based on REGARD (OS 5,2 versus 3,8 months, HR 0,776), and with paclitaxel in November 2014 based on RAINBOW (OS 9,6 versus 7,4 months, HR 0,81; PFS 4,4 versus 2,9 months, HR 0,64). Today it is mainly used second-line with paclitaxel.
Trastuzumab deruxtecan (Enhertu) was approved on January 15, 2021 based on DESTINY-Gastric01 in HER2-positive patients previously treated with trastuzumab-containing therapy (ORR %40,5 versus %11,3; OS 12,5 versus 8,4 months). The more recent DESTINY-Gastric04 compared T-DXd with ramucirumab+paclitaxel second-line and confirmed an overall survival advantage (14,7 versus 11,4 months) — these data strengthen T-DXd's second-line position in HER2-positive disease.
Trifluridine/tipiracil (Lonsurf) was approved on February 25, 2019 based on TAGS in patients progressing after at least two prior lines of treatment (OS 5,7 versus 3,6 months, HR 0,69; PFS 2,0 versus 1,8 months, HR 0,57). This oral agent offers an important option for heavily pretreated patients. Irinotecan-based regimens can also be used as a guideline-supported (NCCN) later-line option, although not based on a specific FDA approval.

Treatment-Related Side Effects and Their Management
Chemotherapy (FLOT Components and Others)
Agents such as 5-fluorouracil/capecitabine, oxaliplatin, docetaxel, cisplatin and irinotecan can cause class-typical side effects such as nausea and vomiting, bone marrow suppression (neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia), mucositis, diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome and peripheral neuropathy. Blood counts are monitored regularly, effective preventive drugs are used for nausea, and signs of peripheral neuropathy (tingling or numbness in the hands/feet) must be reported to the physician.
Targeted Therapies
Trastuzumab and zanidatamab require monitoring of cardiac function before treatment and at regular intervals (risk of cardiac toxicity). Ramucirumab is associated with hypertension, proteinuria and increased bleeding risk; blood pressure should be monitored regularly. Trastuzumab deruxtecan carries a drug class-specific risk of interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis — developing a cough or shortness of breath requires urgent assessment. Zolbetuximab is frequently associated with nausea and vomiting; these side effects are usually more pronounced during initial infusions and are managed with prophylactic antiemetics.
Immunotherapy (Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Tislelizumab)
Checkpoint inhibitors carry a risk of "immune-related adverse events" due to the immune system attacking its own tissues (colitis, hepatitis, pneumonitis, thyroid dysfunction and other endocrine disorders, skin reactions). These side effects can usually be managed well when recognized and treated early; however, because some may be serious/life-threatening, any new symptom (diarrhea, jaundice, cough/shortness of breath, extreme fatigue) must be reported immediately.


Long-Term Effects After Gastrectomy
Dumping syndrome (early/late symptoms due to food passing too quickly into the small intestine), B12 and iron deficiency (requiring regular monitoring and supplementation when needed), adverse effects on bone health and weight loss are common long-term problems after gastrectomy. Small, frequent meals; avoiding drinking fluids with meals; a diet high in protein/fiber and low in simple sugars; and regular dietitian follow-up are the main management approaches.
FDA Approval History: The Accelerating Revolution in Stomach/GEJ Cancer Treatment
Trastuzumab The First Targeted Therapy
The first targeted therapy approved for HER2-positive metastatic stomach/GEJ cancer, based on ToGA.
Ramucirumab (Single Agent)
Approved as a single agent second-line, based on REGARD.
Ramucirumab + Paclitaxel
Approved as second-line combination therapy, based on RAINBOW.
Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102)
Approved as third-line treatment, based on TAGS.
Trastuzumab Deruxtecan The First Antibody-Drug Conjugate
Approved second-line in HER2-positive disease, based on DESTINY-Gastric01; the first antibody-drug conjugate approved in stomach cancer.
Nivolumab The First First-Line Immunotherapy
Approved first-line with chemotherapy, based on CheckMate 649; the first first-line immunotherapy approval in stomach/GEJ cancer.
Pembrolizumab (First-Line)
Approved with chemotherapy in HER2-negative disease, based on KEYNOTE-859.
Zolbetuximab (Vyloy) The First Claudin 18.2-Targeted Therapy
Approved in HER2-negative/Claudin 18.2-positive disease, based on SPOTLIGHT and GLOW; the first approved drug targeting this biomarker.
Pembrolizumab + Trastuzumab (HER2-Positive)
Received full approval in HER2-positive patients with PD-L1 CPS≥1, based on KEYNOTE-811.
Durvalumab + FLOT (MATTERHORN) The First Perioperative Immunotherapy
Adding durvalumab to perioperative FLOT was approved for resectable disease; the first perioperative immunotherapy approval in stomach/GEJ cancer.
Zanidatamab + Tislelizumab (HERIZON-GEA-01) The Latest Approval
A new targeted therapy-immunotherapy combination significantly prolonging overall survival compared with trastuzumab was approved for first-line HER2-positive disease.
Diagnosis, Licensing and Reimbursement in Türkiye
Trastuzumab (for HER2-positive disease) and the components of FLOT (5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin, docetaxel) are licensed by TİTCK and covered by SGK in Türkiye; these are the most reliably accessible standard treatments for stomach/GEJ cancer in Türkiye.
Nivolumab's stomach/GEJ/esophageal adenocarcinoma indication (PD-L1 CPS≥5, HER2-negative, first-line, with chemotherapy) is licensed by TİTCK and was specifically added to SGK reimbursement with the SUT update dated July 10, 2025 (reportedly limited to 24 months). This is the first and currently the only clear example of SGK covering immunotherapy in stomach cancer.
Although ramucirumab is licensed by TİTCK, it is absent from the standard SGK reimbursement list — patients frequently have to obtain access through litigation (a Court of Cassation ruling in January 2026 sent such a case for reconsideration). Pembrolizumab's stomach/GEJ cancer indication was not included in the July 10, 2025 SUT update (that update added only the triple-negative breast cancer and nasopharynx-sparing head and neck squamous cell cancer indications); according to available sources, stomach cancer is not among the indications for pembrolizumab covered by SGK. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (Enhertu) is licensed in Türkiye but not covered by SGK (patients obtain access through litigation). Trifluridine/tipiracil (Lonsurf) is also licensed by TİTCK but is absent from SGK's reimbursement list for both colorectal and stomach cancer indications.
No records were found in Turkish drug databases (TİTCK product codes, price list) for zolbetuximab (Vyloy), zanidatamab (Ziihera) or tislelizumab (Tevimbra); these three drugs are considered unlicensed in Türkiye and therefore not covered by SGK, at least as of the date this guide was prepared — particularly as not even a day has passed since FDA approval of the zanidatamab+tislelizumab combination, this is an expected outcome. Because current licensing and reimbursement status can change quickly, direct checks of TİTCK and SGK's official sources are recommended before treatment decisions.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Are stomach cancer and a stomach ulcer the same?
- No. A stomach ulcer is a benign sore, usually due to H. pylori or painkiller use; however, because some ulcer-like lesions may actually be cancer, nonhealing or recurrent ulcers must be assessed by biopsy.
- What is the difference between stomach cancer and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer?
- Both can be adenocarcinomas, but the precise tumor location (Siewert classification) affects the surgical approach and some treatment decisions; GEJ tumors can be treated with esophageal or stomach cancer protocols according to location.
- Is everyone with metastatic stomach cancer now given the same chemotherapy?
- No. Today, patients are assigned to different biomarker-directed treatment arms according to HER2, Claudin 18.2, PD-L1 and MSI status; therefore, performing these tests in every patient diagnosed with metastatic disease is crucial.
- There is a family history of stomach cancer. Am I at risk too?
- A family history can increase stomach cancer risk; particularly if stomach cancer occurred at a young age or in multiple close relatives, genetic counseling and testing may be recommended for syndromes such as hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (CDH1). It is important to share your family history with your doctor in detail.
- How can very recently approved drugs such as zanidatamab+tislelizumab be accessed in Türkiye?
- Such a recently approved treatment generally takes time to enter the licensing and reimbursement process in Türkiye. You are advised to confirm the current situation directly with your physician or TİTCK/SGK's official sources, and ask about clinical trials you may qualify for.
- Sung H, et al. "Global cancer statistics 2024." CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2026. DOI: 10.3322/caac.70090
- IARC Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN 2024) — Stomach Cancer and Türkiye Country Fact Sheet. gco.iarc.who.int
- Siegel RL, et al. "Cancer Statistics, 2026." CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2026. DOI: 10.3322/caac.70043
- Liang JL, et al. Stomach cancer risk factors, umbrella review. Frontiers in Oncology, 2025.
- Lagergren J, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux and adenocarcinoma risk. New England Journal of Medicine, 1999.
- Blair VR, et al. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer, updated clinical guideline. Lancet Oncology, 2020.
- Laurén P. The two main histological types of gastric carcinoma. Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scandinavica, 1965.
- The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature, 2014.
- Petrelli F, et al. Prognostic value of diffuse and intestinal histotypes, meta-analysis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 2017.
- Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Classification of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. British Journal of Surgery, 1998.
- AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8. Edition, Stomach Cancer Chapter. Springer, 2017.
- Piessen G, et al. Optimal lymph node dissection in stomach cancer, review. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2024.
- Al-Batran SE, et al. FLOT4, perioperative chemotherapy. Lancet, 2019.
- FDA approval announcement: Durvalumab + FLOT (MATTERHORN), perioperative immunotherapy, November 25, 2025.
- KEYNOTE-585 study, perioperative pembrolizumab, negative results — FDA approval was not granted.
- FDA approval announcement: Zanidatamab (Ziihera) + Tislelizumab (Tevimbra), HERIZON-GEA-01 study, August 25, 2026.
- Van Cutsem E, et al. ToGA study, trastuzumab. Lancet, 2010; FDA approval October 20, 2010.
- FDA approval announcement: Pembrolizumab + trastuzumab, KEYNOTE-811, March 19, 2025.
- Shitara K, et al. SPOTLIGHT and GLOW studies, zolbetuximab. Lancet/Nature Medicine, 2023; FDA approval October 18, 2024.
- Janjigian YY, et al. CheckMate 649, nivolumab. Lancet, 2021; FDA approval April 16, 2021.
- Rha SY, et al. KEYNOTE-859, pembrolizumab. Lancet Oncology, 2023; FDA approval November 16, 2023.
- Fuchs CS, et al. REGARD; Wilke H, et al. RAINBOW, ramucirumab. Lancet Oncology, 2014; FDA approvals April 21, 2014 and November 2014.
- Shitara K, et al. DESTINY-Gastric01/04, trastuzumab deruxtecan. Lancet Oncology/NEJM, 2020-2025; FDA approval January 15, 2021.
- Shitara K, et al. TAGS study, trifluridine/tipiracil. Lancet Oncology, 2018; FDA approval February 25, 2019.
- Communiqué Amending the Health Implementation Communiqué, July 10, 2025 (SGK SUT update).
Sources
2. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2019. Learn about clinical studies. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/about-studies/learn. Accessed 23st July 2024.
3. Curigliano G, Lenihan D, Fradley M, et al; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Management of cardiac disease in cancer patients throughout oncological treatment: ESMO consensus recommendations. Ann Oncol 2020;31(2):171–190.
4. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, et al. Global cancer observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer 2020. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today. Accessed 23th July 2024.
5. Harada K, Zhao M, Shanbhag N, et al. Palliative care for advanced gastric cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2020;20(7):575–580.
6. Jordan K, Aapro M, Kaasa S, et al. European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) position paper on supportive and palliative care. Ann Oncol 2018;29(1):36–43.
7. Kloke M and Cherny N. Treatment of dyspnoea in advanced cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol 2015;26(Suppl 5)
–v173.
8. Lordick F, Carneiro F, Cascinu S, et al; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2022;33(10):1005–1020.
9. Macmillan. 2022. Chemotherapy side effects. Available from: https://www.macmillan.org.uk/cancer-information-and-support/treatment/types-of-treatment/chemotherapy/side-effects-of-chemotherapy. Accessed 25st July 2024.
10. Pérez Fidalgo JA, García Fabregat L, Cervantes A, et al; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Management of chemotherapy extravasation: ESMO-EONS Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol 2012;23(Suppl 7)
11. Wolin KY, Dart H, Colditz GA. Eight ways to stay healthy after cancer: an evidence-based message. Cancer Causes Control 2013;24(5):827–837.
12. Cancer Hope Network. "Cancer Hope Network." https://cancerhopenetwork.org.
13. Debbie’s Dream Foundation: Curing Stomach Cancer. "Debbie’s Dream Foundation: Curing Stomach Cancer." https://DebbiesDream.org.
14. Hope for Stomach Cancer. "Hope for Stomach Cancer." https://Stocan.org.
15. MedlinePlus. "Stomach Cancer." https://medlineplus.gov/stomachcancer.html.
16. National Cancer Institute (NCI). "Stomach Cancer." https://cancer.gov/types/stomach.
17. No Stomach for Cancer. "No Stomach for Cancer." https://Nostomachforcancer.org.
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps us improve our content.




