How Has Survival Changed in Urothelial Cancer Before and After Immunotherapy and ADCs?

In this article
Real-World Data on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Antibody-Drug Conjugates
🔍 Why Does It Matter?
- Urothelial cancers arise primarily in the bladder , but also in the ureters, renal pelvis and urethra . More than 90% arise in the bladder .
- Worldwide, approximately 573,000 new bladder cancer cases occur annually, with nearly 213,000 deaths.
- Bladder cancer is among the 10 commonest cancers in men, with high mortality and a tendency to recur.
Approximately 10-15% have metastatic (Stage 4) disease at diagnosis . A substantial proportion initially diagnosed with localized or non-muscle-invasive disease may later develop metastases; in muscle-invasive disease this may reach 50% . Overall, around 30-40% of bladder cancer patients face distant metastasis during their lives.
Metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC), including bladder cancer, generally has a poor prognosis. With conventional chemotherapy, 5-year survival was below 5%. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) could change this, but their effects outside clinical trials, in everyday practice, were less clear.
📊 JAMA Network Openpublished a large retrospective analysis on 9 July 2025 that provides an answer: New immunotherapies and ADCs significantly improve overall survival.
Graphical Summary

🔬 Study Details
- Data Source: US Flatiron Health electronic health records database
- Period: 8,955 patients starting treatment in 2011–2023
- Follow-Up: Through 30 September 2024
- Treatment Eras Included:
- Before immunotherapy (2011–2016) – predominantly chemotherapy
- After immunotherapy, before ADCs (2017–2019) – immunotherapy introduction
- After ADC introduction (2020–2023) – modern era including ADCs
❗ Patients receiving investigational trial drugs or no treatment were excluded.
NOTE: The main ADC used in urothelial cancer is nectin-4-targeting enfortumab vedotin (brand: Padcev). Less commonly, Trop-2-targeting sacituzumab govitecan (Trodelvy) is also used in selected patients.
📈 Survival Data
✅ 3-Year Overall Survival Rates:
| Era | 3-Year OS | Confidence Interval |
|---|---|---|
| Before immunotherapy (2011–2016) | 19.2% | (17.5%–20.9%) |
| After immunotherapy, before ADCs (2017–2019) | 23.3% | (21.6%–24.9%) |
| After ADC introduction (2020–2023) | 27.6% | (25.7%–29.5%) |
🔹 These findings represent an 8.4% absolute and 44% relative increase .

🕒 Median Overall Survival:
- 2011–2016: 11.1 months
- 2020–2023: 13.6 months (significant difference, p < 0.001)
📌 What Does the Study Mean?
The study demonstrates benefits not only in clinical trials but also in real-world practice , where new-generation treatments offer substantial survival advantages to metastatic urothelial cancer patients.
In Particular:
- The contribution of ADCs such as enfortumab vedotin is evident.
- Data on combinations such asPadcev + Keytruda, pairing an ADC with immunotherapy, are also expected in the near future.
⚠️ Limitations
- Flatiron mainly covers community clinics , with limited academic-center data.
- The full effect of ADC + immunotherapy combinations, such as enfortumab + pembrolizumab (FDA approval: December 2023), could not yet be assessed.
- The retrospective design means treatment-related differences in patient characteristics could not be fully eliminated. Statistical methods, particularly inverse probability weighting, balanced these as far as possible.
💬 Conclusion
This large cohort strongly links survival improvements in metastatic urothelial cancer over the past decade to the introduction of immunotherapy and ADCs .
Over time, these developmentswill shape daily practice and clinical trial designs that can provide benchmarks for new treatment combinations.
Sources
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps us improve our content.





Reader comments
Share your comment
Your name and comment are published only after administrator approval. Your email address is never shown to visitors.
Be the first to comment.