Skip to content
Prof. Dr. Mustafa Özdoğan · Medical Oncologist
Contact+90 (538) 677 60 18

A Gut Bacterium Could Be a Solution for Keeping Lost Weight Off

A Gut Bacterium Could Be a Solution for Keeping Lost Weight Off
In this article

Akkermansia muciniphila Reduced Weight Regain to One Third

Losing weight is relatively easy; maintaining the weight loss over the long term is difficult. Even after low-energy diets, GLP-1 receptor agonists (semaglutide, tirzepatide), and bariatric surgery, a large proportion of patients regain 30-50% of what they lost within 1-2 years. This regain is not merely an aesthetic or metabolic issue — it is a critical factor in obesity's cumulative cancer burden. For, as documented by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) 2016 working group, for at least 13 different types of cancer , obesity is a proven risk factor: postmenopausal breast, colorectal, endometrial, esophageal adenocarcinoma, kidney, pancreatic, gastric cardia, hepatocellular carcinoma, gallbladder, ovarian, thyroid, multiple myeloma, and meningioma. Long-term weight control is therefore directly part of a cancer prevention strategy. A study led by Ellen Blaak at Maastricht University and published on May 12, 2026 in Nature Medicine, the Amansia study , added a new factor to this equation: pasteurized (heat-inactivated) Akkermansia muciniphila strain MucTwas used as a daily oral supplement in a study of 84 adults who had lost 8+% of their weight with a low-energy diet. Over the following 24 weeks, from 32,9% to 13,6% , weight regain decreased (p=0,012); weight regain was 1,2 kg in the MucT group and 3,2 kg with placebo. In addition, approximately 40% of participants in the MucT group lost even more weight during the maintenance phase, compared with only 5% with placebo. Insulin sensitivity was better maintained. This finding has meaning for drozdogan.com readers on two levels: first, as an obesity–cancer prevention pathway, and second, in the context of the microbiome's direct effects on oncology — because A. muciniphila has for years been recognized as a bacterium prominent in studies of immune checkpoint inhibitor response.
— BACKGROUND: THE OBESITY–CANCER LINK —

13 Different Cancers, a Single Metabolic Condition

Obesity is one of the most devastating epidemiological crises of global health in the 21st century. According to WHO estimates for 2024, 16% of the adult population is obese (BMI ≥30), and 39% is overweight (BMI ≥25). Since 1975, obesity prevalence has tripled worldwide. According to TURDEP-II and subsequent national studies in Turkey, adult obesity prevalence is above 32% — above the European average and among the highest ranges in OECD countries.

The link between obesity and cancer has been firmly demonstrated by cumulative epidemiological evidence over the past 25 years. The IARC 2016 working group monograph (Lauby-Secretan et al., NEJM 2016), with regard to 13 cancer types at the level of “sufficient evidence”, classified obesity as a risk factor:

CANCER TYPES WITH A PROVEN CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP TO OBESITY (IARC 2016)

  • Postmenopausal breast cancer — particularly the hormone receptor-positive (luminal) subtype
  • Colorectal cancer — particularly in men, predominantly in the distal colon and rectum
  • Endometrial cancer — the strongest obesity–cancer association (RR between 2-7)
  • Esophageal adenocarcinoma — mediated through GERD/Barrett's esophagus
  • Kidney (renal cell) cancer
  • Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
  • Gastric cardia cancer
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) — through the NAFLD/MASLD-MASH pathway
  • Gallbladder cancer
  • Ovarian cancer (moderate evidence)
  • Thyroid cancer
  • Multiple myeloma
  • Meningioma

The mechanisms are multilayered: chronic low-grade inflammation (increased TNF-α, IL-6, CRP), hyperinsulinemia and activation of the IGF-1 pathway, peripheral estrogen synthesis through aromatase in adipose tissue (critical for postmenopausal breast/endometrial cancer), immune-metabolic dialogue between adipose tissue and the gut microbiome, leptin/adiponectin dysregulation, and the hepatic insulin resistance–MASLD–HCC chain. These hypotheses are not independent of one another; rather, they form parallel pathways that reinforce each other.

— AKKERMANSIA MUCINIPHILA: THE BACTERIUM DISCOVERED IN 2004 —

A Living Resident of the Gut's Mucus Layer

Akkermansia muciniphila, in 2004 — named after Antoon Akkermans— was described by Dutch microbiologist Muriel Derrien. This bacterium is a Gram-negative, anaerobic, oval, nonmotile, mucin-degrading strain; its type strain is MucT (ATCC BAA-835). It makes up approximately 1-4% of a healthy adult's gut microbiota; its main spatial location is the colonic mucus layer. As its name suggests, its primary food source consists of the mucin molecules produced by the intestinal epithelium; by breaking down mucins, it both obtains nutrients for itself and stimulates mucin production by the intestinal epithelium. This seemingly paradoxical balance — the bacterium stimulates the host that produces its food — is critical for maintaining gut barrier function.

In human cohorts, a pattern of A. muciniphila abundance that was inversely related to the following conditions was observed: obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), and liver steatosis (MASLD/MASH). In other words, high in healthy individuals and low in ill individuals — a classic sign of a “beneficial bacterium”.

The truly interesting finding came in 2007 from a study by Patrice Cani's team (Brussels, UCLouvain): when obese mice fed a high-fat diet were supplemented with A. muciniphila , weight gain slowed, glucose tolerance improved, and the gut barrier strengthened. More surprisingly, the bacterium produced better results when it was not alive — pasteurized, meaning heat-inactivated at 70°C for 30 minutes. The reason was that an outer-membrane protein, Amuc_1100, was heat-stable and stimulated gut barrier function through the TLR2 receptor. This is the basic mechanistic explanation for the paradox of “dead bacteria are better than live bacteria.”

The first pivotal evidence in humans came in 2019 from Cani and Depommier's team's proof-of-concept study in Nature Medicine: in 32 overweight/obese volunteers, pasteurized A. muciniphila improved insulin sensitivity, reduced insulinemia, and lowered markers of liver dysfunction over 3 months. No side effects. This study showed that A. muciniphila supplementation is safe and metabolically beneficial in humans — but larger RCTs with longer follow-up were needed for clinically meaningful weight control. The Amansia study published on May 12, 2026 filled this gap.

— AMANSIA RCT — STUDY DESIGN —

A Two-Phase Dietary Protocol and Randomization in the Maintenance Phase

Mount and colleagues' study design has a subtle distinctive feature: as for the weight-loss phase, all participants completed it; what occurred afterward was randomization. This solves a critical methodological problem in weight-control research — it eliminates differences between groups in the amount of weight lost initially.

AMANSIA RCT DESIGN

  • Phase 1 — Open Weight Loss (8 weeks): 90 adults (mean age 53, ~50% women, BMI ≥27, overweight/obese) followed a low-energy diet (approximately 800-1000 kcal/day, controlled nutritional profile). Target: ≥8% weight loss.
  • Exclusion: 6 participants did not reach the 8% weight-loss target and were excluded from the study. Those proceeding to Phase 2 numbered n=84.
  • Phase 2 — Randomization and Maintenance (24 weeks): 84 participants were randomized 1:1 → MucT group (n=42) or placebo (n=42). MucT was a daily oral capsule, taken with water 15 minutes before breakfast. Placebo was an inert powder of identical appearance. A healthy ad libitum diet (no calorie restriction).
  • Study Masking: Quadruple-blind (participant, investigator, measurement team, and analyzing statistician). A high methodological standard.
  • Primary Endpoint: Change in body weight during the 24-week maintenance phase.
  • Secondary Endpoints: Body composition (DEXA), insulin sensitivity (hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp or OGTT), blood pressure, lipid profile, inflammatory markers, and fecal microbiota profile (16S rRNA).

Pasteurized A. muciniphila MucT is a product owned by Belgium-based The Akkermansia Company SAand consists of capsules containing a white homogeneous powder prepared from heat-inactivated bacteria. Each capsule contains approximately 10⁹ pasteurized bacterial equivalents (according to the Cani laboratory standard).

— MAIN FINDINGS —

The Dramatic Difference in the Maintenance Phase

1,2 kg
Weight regain in the MucT group during the 24-week maintenance phase (±0,7)
3,2 kg
Weight regain in the placebo group (±0,4)
%13,6
Proportion of the lost weight regained in the MucT group
%32,9
Proportion of the lost weight regained in the placebo group
Amansia RCT — Body Weight Trajectory During the 24-Week Maintenance Phase n=84, Pasteurized A. muciniphila MucT vs Placebo (Mount et al., Nature Medicine 2026) +5 kg +2,5 kg 0 (week 8) -2,5 kg -5 kg Change from week 8 Week 8 (end of diet, randomization) Week 14 Week 20 Week 26 Week 32 (end of study) +3,2 kg +1,2 kg p=0,012 Pasteurized MucT (n=42) Placebo (n=42)
Figure 1. Amansia RCT — weight regain profile in the MucT vs placebo group during the 24-week maintenance phase. Gradual and continuous weight regain in the placebo group (+3,2 kg at the end of 32 weeks), markedly slower regain in the MucT group (+1,2 kg). The data are for schematic representation; the exact weekly values are plotted in the Mount et al. 2026 paper.

Alongside the numerical results, the following pattern is striking: Approximately 16 of the 42 participants in the MucT group (~40%) lost more weight during the maintenance phase — in other words, they did not return to the weight they had reached at the end of the initial diet; they added to their weight loss. Only 2 participants in the placebo group (~5%) showed this pattern. This suggests that MucT may have an active effect of “producing further weight loss” beyond a passive effect of “reducing regain.”

Other Important Findings:

  • Net Weight Loss (from baseline to the end of maintenance): 3,1 kg more net weight loss in the MucT group than with placebo (p=0,009).
  • Insulin Sensitivity: In the MucT group, the improvement achieved after the diet was better maintainedduring the maintenance phase. In the placebo group, insulin sensitivity gradually declined.
  • Microbiota Stratification: Among individuals with low baseline Akkermansia spp., the cardiometabolic effect of MucT was greatest. This is important for the potential to “predict the patient who will respond” — a kind of microbiota-based personalized treatment forecast.
  • Safety: No serious treatment-related adverse effects were reported. Gastrointestinal side effects (temporary mild bloating) were similar in the two groups.
Pasteurized A. muciniphila MucT supplementation may be a promising strategy for long-term weight maintenance after energy restriction or GLP-1 receptor agonist use... This study identifies the gut microbiota as a real therapeutic target in obesity management and positions it as a complementary tool to pharmacological, nutritional, and behavioral strategies — making it an interesting option. — Ellen E. Blaak (PhD, Maastricht University Medical Center, PI) and Francisco Jesús Gómez Delgado (Jaén University Hospital, Vascular Risk Unit coordinator, commentator); Medscape MedBrief, May 13, 2026
— THE REAL STORY FROM AN ONCOLOGY PERSPECTIVE —

Akkermansia and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response

For oncology readers, the study's most striking context is the literature in which A. muciniphilaand, for years, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response have been linked. The cornerstone of this story was, in 2018 in Science , the published study by Routy and colleagues:

ROUTY AND COLLEAGUES, SCIENCE 2018 — A CRITICAL PUBLICATION

Bertrand Routy, Laurence Zitvogel, and the Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus team examined the anti-PD-1 / anti-PD-L1 treatment response alongside fecal microbiota analysis in 249 patients with advanced lung, kidney, and urothelial cancers. The result: in the fecal microbiota of patients who responded to treatment, Akkermansia muciniphila abundance was significantly higher than in nonresponders. More strikingly, treatment response was markedly lower in patients who used antibiotics (before or during immune checkpoint therapy) — and this difference could be explained through microbiome composition. In a fecal microbiota transplantation experiment in mice, a stronger anti-PD-1 response was observed in the tumors of mice receiving fecal material from human “responders”; this response could be rescued with oral A. muciniphila supplementation.

After the Routy study, independent cohorts — Gopalakrishnan et al. (MD Anderson, melanoma, Science 2018), Matson et al. (Chicago, melanoma, Science 2018), and various lung cancer and melanoma cohorts in subsequent years — reinforced this finding. A. muciniphilarose to the top of the list of “biomarker bacteria” for immunotherapy response.

The mechanistic explanation is still not fully clear, but the dominant hypothesis is this: A. muciniphila, by strengthening gut barrier function, reduces systemic inflammation; at the same time, it stimulates the migration of CCR9⁺ T cells to lymph nodes and thereby contributes to the recruitment of a systemic antitumor immune response. In other words, A. muciniphila is not merely a “metabolic health bacterium”; it is also an immunological antitumor coregulator.

In this context, the message of the Amansia study becomes multilayered:

  1. Pasteurized MucT may gradually reduce the obesity-related cancer burden (through weight control).
  2. Pasteurized MucT — and the abundance of live A. muciniphila — may increase oncology patients' ICI response (along the Routy line of evidence).
  3. Maintaining gut barrier function may independently lower the risk of cancer initiation by reducing systemic chronic inflammation.

Important Warning: These three links are based on epidemiological, mechanistic, and translational evidence, but in clinical oncology practice pasteurized A. muciniphila is not routinely recommended. Oncology patients starting this supplement on their own is not supported by the level of evidence — particularly in patients receiving active treatment.

— COMPARISON: GLP-1 RA, BARIATRIC SURGERY, MUCT —
GLP-1 RA (SEMAGLUTIDE, TIRZEPATIDE)

Approximately 15-22% weight loss (higher with tirzepatide). A very powerful effect. However, weight regain after discontinuation is marked (STEP 4 trial: 66% regain in 1 year after stopping). High cost, injection. From the perspective of oncology economics, a potential tool for obesity-related cancer prevention (under assessment by TGA and FDA). Contraindicated in medullary thyroid cancer and MEN2 syndrome.

BARIATRIC SURGERY

Approximately 25-35% weight loss. The strongest long-term effect. Aminian et al., JAMA 2022: reduces obesity-related cancer incidence by 32%. The Sjöström SOS study and retrospective cohorts by Adams et al. show similar mortality benefits. However, invasive, with surgical risks and nutritional deficiencies.

PASTEURIZED MUCT — AMANSIA 2026

Approximately 3 kg additional net weight loss (modest). An adjunctive strategy for weight maintenance. Low side-effect profile, oral, potentially inexpensive (commercial price is not yet clear). Insufficient on its own, but promising as a combination strategy. At the heart of the microbiome-modulation approach.

LIFESTYLE INTERVENTIONS

Standard practice based on diet + exercise and behavioral change. Long-term weight loss of 3-5%, but a high regain rate. A cornerstone of cancer prevention in ACS and WCRF guidelines.

MucT's role in this landscape, as part of a combination strategy and not a treatment on its own , is being defined. As Mount and colleagues explicitly note: “for long-term weight maintenance after energy restriction or GLP-1 receptor agonist use”. In other words, for a patient started on semaglutide/tirzepatide, a MucT combination could be considered upon discontinuation to soften weight regain after GLP-1 RA. This is a hypothesis that has not yet been tested prospectively, but has strong clinical logic.

— THE TURKISH PERSPECTIVE —
The Burden of Obesity and Cancer in Turkey. Adult obesity prevalence in Turkey, at 32+%, is among the highest ranges in the OECD. Obesity prevalence is 39+% in Turkish women and 24+% in men (data from TURKSTAT and the Turkish Society of Hypertension and Renal Diseases). The estimated annual Turkish burden of the 13 obesity-related cancer types is 20-25% of all cancer cases. Postmenopausal breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in Turkey; colorectal cancer is among the top 3 in both men and women; endometrial cancer is increasing with the epidemiology of obesity in adolescents and young adults. In this landscape, turning weight control into a sustainable tool is critical for national public health.

The pasteurized A. muciniphila product (The Akkermansia Company SA, Belgium), as a dietary supplement in Europe, has been sold since 2020 (Wellsma brand in some markets; in Turkey, accessible through individual import under different names/brands). Under Turkish Ministry of Health regulation it is positioned as a food supplement; available without prescription, but the cost is still high (80-150 € per month). Clinical use is currently limited in Turkish dietitian and endocrinology clinics.

For Turkish oncology readers, the study's practical message is that obesity control is a multidisciplinary task. The recurrence and survival profile over the years of a postmenopausal patient receiving a second opinion for breast cancer at Memorial Göztepe Cancer Center is shaped not only by oncological treatment choices, but also by sustained weight control between oncological treatments. Achieving obesity control after endometrial cancer significantly reduces the five-year risk of recurrence (adjuvant weight-loss studies in postmenopausal endometrial cancer, SUCCESS-C, and other cohorts). This is why integration of anti-obesity strategies into the cancer care algorithm is a main heading on modern oncology's “survivorship” (follow-up of survival after cancer) agenda.

— LIMITATIONS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST —
Attention to the Study's Limitations. The Amansia RCT has a small sample size (n=84 proceeding to the maintenance phase), short follow-up (24 weeks — insufficient for long-term weight control; ideally at least 1-2 years), no pasteurized control bacterial strain (meaning an ideal comparison to isolate the specific A. muciniphila effect could not be performed), and a single-center, single-country design. Generalizability to US and Asian populations is particularly limited. PI Ellen Blaak is a scientific adviser to The Akkermansia Company SA and an inventor on a patent application related to this study; this is an important conflict of interest, and multicenter Phase 3 trials are needed for independent validation of the results.

The Akkermansia Company's pasteurized MucT product has been marketed for the past 5 years; this study is the first large RCT to bring clinical evidence at the Nature Medicine level. However, it is a product on the boundary of the “nutraceutical–pharmaceutical confusion” typically seen with dietary supplements — sold as a dietary supplement, yet evidence is being generated for a medical indication (weight maintenance). This boundary requires careful monitoring at both the regulatory and ethical levels.

⚡ DROZDOGAN ACADEMY — CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
⚡ WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Obesity is a proven risk factor for 13 different cancer types; adult obesity prevalence in Turkey is 32+%, and ~20-25% of the cancer burden is associated with obesity. Losing weight is relatively easy, maintaining it difficult — the regain rate is 30-50%. In the Amansia RCT, pasteurized A. muciniphila MucT is shown to be capable of reducing weight regain to one third in the maintenance phase, while 40% of participants can lose further weight. The same bacterium is one of the critical biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor response (Routy 2018 Science) — it therefore occupies a special place at the oncology–microbiome intersection.

✅ STRENGTHS / EVIDENCE

Phase 2 RCT, quadruple-blind, parallel-group design, placebo-controlled. n=84 entered the maintenance phase — equal allocation of the weight-loss cohort. A clearly defined primary endpoint (24-week weight change), p=0,012. Consistent secondary findings (insulin sensitivity, microbiota stratification). Among individuals with low baseline Akkermansia the response was better — potential for personalized medicine. Consistent with previous preclinical literature (Cani laboratory 2007-2023) and the human proof-of-concept study (Depommier 2019 Nature Med). No serious side effects.

⚠️ LIMITATIONS

Small sample (n=84), single center in Maastricht, ethnically homogeneous Dutch cohort. Short follow-up (24 weeks) — insufficient for long-term weight control, ideally 1-2 years. No pasteurized control bacterial strain (an ideal control to separate the specific MucT effect was not used). PI Ellen Blaak is a scientific adviser to The Akkermansia Company SA and an inventor on a patent application — an important conflict of interest. Evidence only for weight control; no direct evidence for obesity-related cancer prevention (follow-up cohorts with long observation are needed). Dietary supplement status — looser regulation than for pharmaceuticals.

🩺 IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

At Memorial Göztepe, Acıbadem, and other oncology centers, for obese patients requiring weight control (particularly postmenopausal breast cancer and endometrial cancer survivors), pasteurized A. muciniphila products may be discussed individually by dietitians; however, the level of evidence is not yet sufficient for routine recommendations. In patients receiving active cancer treatment (particularly ICI), starting a supplement should be a team decision — possible conflict with antibiotic use, uncertain effects on ICI response, and the still-immature literature on probiotic–immunotherapy interactions. In patients receiving or stopping GLP-1 RA treatment (during rebound weight regain after semaglutide), an adjunctive MucT strategy is a reasonable hypothesis — but there is no prospective evidence. The general message for patients: weight control is critical for cancer prevention, but the essential approach is to rely on a multidisciplinary lifestyle + medical treatment package, rather than a single supplement.

❓ FUTURE QUESTIONS

Is the weight-control efficacy of MucT sustainable in Phase 3 RCTs with long follow-up of 1-2 years? Does an adjunctive MucT combination after stopping GLP-1 RA (semaglutide, tirzepatide) prevent rebound weight regain (a hypothesis not yet tested)? Does pasteurized MucT improve treatment response in oncology patients receiving ICI — prospective clinical validation of the Routy line of evidence? Does an adjunctive MucT strategy reduce obesity-related recurrence risk in postmenopausal breast cancer or endometrial cancer survivors? In the Turkish population, for Akkermansia , what is the baseline prevalence and does it differ from European cohorts? Is pasteurized MucT safe and effective in treating childhood obesity (no pediatric data yet)? When will “microbiome-based personalized treatment” — deciding on MucT use according to fecal microbiota profiling — enter clinical practice? How will the effect of competition between The Akkermansia Company's patent portfolio and other commercial actors on independent science be monitored?

References

  1. Mount S, Canfora EE, Goossens GH, ..., Blaak EE. Pasteurized Akkermansia muciniphila MucT for weight loss maintenance in people with overweight and obesity: a controlled randomized trial. Nature Medicine 2026 (online, May 12, 2026). doi:10.1038/s41591-026-04394-7
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. Effect of Pasteurized Akkermansia Muciniphilia on Maintenance of Body Weight After a Low Calorie Diet (Amansia). NCT05417360. Maastricht University Medical Center, sponsor.
  3. Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, et al.; International Agency for Research on Cancer Handbook Working Group. Body fatness and cancer—viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. New England Journal of Medicine 2016;375(8):794-798. doi:10.1056/NEJMsr1606602 (Key reference for the obesity-13-cancer link.)
  4. Depommier C, Everard A, Druart C, et al. Supplementation with Akkermansia muciniphila in overweight and obese human volunteers: a proof-of-concept exploratory study. Nature Medicine 2019;25(7):1096-1103. doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0495-2 (The first pivotal proof-of-concept study in humans.)
  5. Routy B, Le Chatelier E, Derosa L, et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science 2018;359(6371):91-97. doi:10.1126/science.aan3706 (Critical reference for Akkermansia and ICI response.)
  6. Plovier H, Everard A, Druart C, et al. A purified membrane protein from Akkermansia muciniphila or the pasteurized bacterium improves metabolism in obese and diabetic mice. Nature Medicine 2017;23(1):107-113. (Pasteurization paradox and the Amuc_1100 protein mechanism.)
  7. Derrien M, Vaughan EE, Plugge CM, de Vos WM. Akkermansia muciniphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a human intestinal mucin-degrading bacterium. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 2004;54(Pt 5):1469-1476. (The first description of Akkermansia.)
  8. Cani PD, Depommier C, Derrien M, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila: paradigm for next-generation beneficial microorganisms. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2022;19(10):625-637. (A modern comprehensive review of Akkermansia.)
  9. Gopalakrishnan V, Spencer CN, Nezi L, et al. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Science 2018;359(6371):97-103. (Parallel evidence for melanoma ICI response.)
  10. Matson V, Fessler J, Bao R, et al. The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients. Science 2018;359(6371):104-108.
  11. Aminian A, Wilson R, Al-Kurd A, et al. Association of bariatric surgery with cancer risk and mortality in adults with obesity. JAMA 2022;327(24):2423-2433. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.9009 (Large cohort on bariatric surgery and cancer reduction.)
  12. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, et al. Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. NEJM 2021;384(11):989-1002. (Pivotal STEP 1 semaglutide study.)
  13. Rubino DM, Greenway FL, Khalid U, et al. Effect of continued weekly subcutaneous semaglutide vs placebo on weight loss maintenance in adults with overweight or obesity: the STEP 4 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021;325(14):1414-1425. (Weight regain after semaglutide discontinuation.)
  14. Turkish Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism. Obesity Diagnosis and Treatment Guideline, current edition 2025. Ankara: TEMD.

This article is for medical news/information and does not provide individual treatment guidance. The Amansia RCT (Nature Medicine, May 12, 2026) is a small-sample Phase 2 study; multicenter prospective Phase 3 validation is needed to change practical clinical standards. Pasteurized Akkermansia muciniphila products are available as food supplements in many European countries, including Turkey; however, oncology patients, particularly those receiving active treatment — chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy — must not start this supplement without consulting their treatment team. The strongest evidence for the obesity–cancer link concerns lifestyle interventions (diet, physical activity, bariatric surgery in selected cases); pasteurized MucT is at the hypothesis stage as a complementary component of this package. A multidisciplinary team (oncologist + dietitian + endocrinologist) is recommended for cancer prevention and weight control after survivorship. Editor's note: The article is based on the Mount et al. 2026 Nature Medicine publication, the Cani laboratory Akkermansia literature, the Routy 2018 Science oncology–microbiome reference, and the IARC 2016 obesity–cancer report.

DROZDOGAN AI

Explore this article together

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

DROZDOGAN AI

Drozdogan Assistant

A Gut Bacterium Could Be a Solution for Keeping Lost Weight Off

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

Conversation and privacy information

Drozdogan Assistant answers this conversation. Authorized site administrators may review it for quality. Do not share personal information.

Replies use OpenAI infrastructure. Questions and replies are processed by that service; conversation records are stored on our site. Do not share identifying, contact or personal health information.

0 / 1000

For information only; no personal diagnosis or treatment advice.

Related articles

Explore other articles on this topic.

Stay informed

Receive new articles and scientific updates by email.

Google Analytics runs on public pages independently of this window and may use analytics cookies. Your choice here controls external services only.

Cookie policy