Skip to content
Prof. Dr. Mustafa Özdoğan · Medical Oncologist
Contact+90 (538) 677 60 18

Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab in Head and Neck Cancer: A Gain or a Paradox?

Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab in Head and Neck Cancer: A Gain or a Paradox?
In this article
Phase III Analysis • March 2026

Results of the LEAP-010 study: adding a targeted agent in PD-L1-positive advanced head and neck carcinoma improved tumor control but offered no survival advantage.

The recurrent or metastatic (R/M) stage of head and neck cancers is one of the most aggressive areas of oncology and among those that most threaten quality of life. Although pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) became standard care with the KEYNOTE-048 study, not all patients achieve this response. Researchers aimed to enhance immunotherapy (synergy) through the antiangiogenic (blood vessel formation-inhibiting) effects of lenvatinib, a multikinase inhibitor. However, in March 2026, the Journal of Clinical Oncologypublication of the LEAP-010 results once again proved how critical it is, when providing "precise guidance" in oncology, to focus not only on shrinking the tumor but also on the patient's overall survival and quality of life.

Historical context and the current treatment algorithm

Until a decade ago, treatment for metastatic head and neck cancer was limited to the "EXTREME" regimen (Platinum + 5-FU + Cetuximab). Today, treatment decisions are shaped entirely by **PD-L1 status**. Here is the current clinical approach:

Recurrent / Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer (R/M HNSCC)
PD-L1 Testing (CPS Score Measurement)
CPS < 1 (Negative)
Platinum + 5-FU + Cetuximab
(EXTREME Regimen)
CPS ≥ 1 (Positive)
Standard Care:
Pembrolizumab (Alone)
OR
Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy
LEAP-010 Trial:
Pembro + Lenvatinib
(No OS Advantage Achieved)

LEAP-010: Study design and patient population

This Phase III randomized, double-blind study, conducted at 140 centers worldwide, included 511 patients who were not considered curable with local treatments such as surgery or radiotherapy.

Combination Arm

256 patients received 20 mg of oral lenvatinib daily and 200 mg of intravenous pembrolizumab every 3 weeks.

Control Arm

255 patients were followed with placebo and standard pembrolizumab treatment every 3 weeks.

Clinical results: tumors shrank, but life was not prolonged

Although the study's initial interim analyses generated great excitement, the final survival data did not meet expectations. Here are the comparative LEAP-010 data:

Clinical Parameter Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab Placebo + Pembrolizumab Result
Objective Response Rate (ORR) %46.1 %25.4 Combination superior
Median PFS (Progression-Free Time) 6.2 Months 2.8 Months 36% reduction in risk
Median OS (Overall Survival) 15.0 Months 17.9 Months No significant difference (HR 1.15)
Grade 3-4 Adverse Effects %66.9 %38.3 High toxicity

Why Was Survival Not Prolonged?

The researchers attribute this paradox to two reasons: first, 44.7% of patients in the placebo arm had the opportunity to receive more treatment in the next line (crossover effect). Second, and more critically, the number of patients who discontinued treatment because of adverse effects was very high in the lenvatinib group. High toxicity may have masked or exhausted the progression-free survival advantage in terms of overall survival.

Current clinical practice: has the standard changed?

The clear message of LEAP-010 is this:In patients with metastatic head and neck cancer and PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1, the gold standard for first-line treatment remains pembrolizumab alone or the combination of pembrolizumab + chemotherapy.

Adding lenvatinib may be considered only in selected cases requiring a very rapid reduction in tumor burden (with a symptomatic mass); however, the fact that this approach does not prolong life and carries a heavy burden of adverse effects must be accurately communicated to the patient.

DROZDOGAN Academy Commentary

Our greatest misconception on the journey toward healing from cancer is believing that "more powerful weapons" will always yield better results. The LEAP-010 study whispers this to us: biological restoration means not only striking the tumor, but also preserving the body's tolerance of this treatment.

Precise guidance means not only prescribing a medicine to the patient but also anticipating in time what that medicine will take away from their quality of life. In a disease group with a heavy physical and psychological burden, such as head and neck cancer, a regimen that increases toxicity without prolonging survival may not be a "precise" choice, however much it shrinks the tumor. Healing means respecting nature's balance and combining the data with the patient's peace of mind.

Scientific References and Further Reading

  • 1. Licitra L, et al. "Pembrolizumab With or Without Lenvatinib as First-Line Therapy for R/M HNSCC: Phase III LEAP-010 Study." Journal of Clinical Oncology. March 12, 2026. doi:10.1200/JCO-25-00570
  • 2. Burtness B, et al. "Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC (KEYNOTE-048)." The Lancet. 2019.
  • 3. Taylor MH, et al. "Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced HNSCC (KEYNOTE-146)." JCO. 2020.
This article was created using various editorial tools, including artificial intelligence, as part of the process. It was reviewed by human editors before publication.
DROZDOGAN AI

Explore this article together

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

DROZDOGAN AI

Drozdogan Assistant

Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab in Head and Neck Cancer: A Gain or a Paradox?

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

Conversation and privacy information

Drozdogan Assistant answers this conversation. Authorized site administrators may review it for quality. Do not share personal information.

Replies use OpenAI infrastructure. Questions and replies are processed by that service; conversation records are stored on our site. Do not share identifying, contact or personal health information.

0 / 1000

For information only; no personal diagnosis or treatment advice.

Related articles

Explore other articles on this topic.

Stay informed

Receive new articles and scientific updates by email.

Google Analytics runs on public pages independently of this window and may use analytics cookies. Your choice here controls external services only.

Cookie policy