Skip to content
Prof. Dr. Mustafa Özdoğan · Medical Oncologist

Genomic, Transcriptomic and Immunogenomic Analysis in Sarcomas and New Therapeutic Targets

Genomic, Transcriptomic and Immunogenomic Analysis in Sarcomas and New Therapeutic Targets
In this article

🧬 Why Is Understanding a Rare Cancer Type Vital?

Sarcomas are rare cancers that arise from connective tissue and can occur anywhere in the body. Although they account for approximately 1% of all cancers, the existence of more than 100 subtypes makes their diagnosis and treatment particularly challenging.

Because of their genetic and molecular diversity, understanding the fundamental biology of this disease group is critical to developing effective, personalized treatment strategies . Unfortunately, current treatment options for advanced sarcomas are limited and often not curative.

Mapping sarcomas at the molecular level to identify factors affecting the disease course and discover new therapeutic targets is therefore of great scientific and clinical importance.

🔍 The Relationship Between Mutational Burden and Metastasis in Sarcomas

On May 6, 2025, Nature Communicationspublished a study in which 1340 sarcoma tumor samples underwent whole-exome (WES) and RNA sequencing analyses, which showed that metastatic tumors had a higher mutational burden than primary tumors (p < 0.001).

This increase was attributed particularly to alterations in TP53 (26%) and ATRX (8.9%) , tumor suppressor genes, in the form of inactivating mutations , while no significant change in the frequency of oncogenic driver mutations was observed.

In addition, whole-genome duplication (WGD) was more common in metastatic samples (p = 0.026). This was particularly evident in GISTand suggests that it may play a critical role in this tumor type in terms of secondary mutations and tumor progression.

💡 Clinical implication: The molecular signature of metastatic sarcomas differs from that of primary tumors; these differences must be taken into account when planning treatment.

🧬 Exploring the Complex World of Sarcomas Through Gene Expression Profiles

This comprehensive analysis examined differences in gene expression among sarcoma subtypes in depth. It showed that tumors of the same histological subtype also form genetically similar clusters .

In particular, subtypes such as leiomyosarcoma, GIST, myxoid liposarcoma and dedifferentiated/well-differentiated liposarcoma were found to form distinct expression subgroups. This finding shows that morphological similarities are also reflected at the molecular level.

The table below shows the genes highly expressed in each sarcoma subtype and their biological roles:

Sarcoma Subtype Highly Expressed Genes Function
Leiomyosarcoma MYOCD, TAGLN, JPH2, CSRP1 Smooth muscle differentiation
Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma HMGA2, CIDEC Adipogenesis
GIST KIT RTK signaling
Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma MDM2 Tumor suppressor inhibition

Immune groups were classified according to the density of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment , and each group was associated with specific sarcoma subtypes:

Immune Group Definition and Characteristics Associated Subtypes Treatment Response Survival
Cold Low immune cell infiltration; immunosuppressed tumor microenvironment Liposarcoma, Myxosarcoma, Chondrosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma Generally unresponsive to immunotherapies Low
Intermediate
(NK cell-rich)
Particularly rich in NK cells; seen in tumors with unique immune profiles, such as GIST GIST (Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor) For NK cell-targeted approaches, there is potential Intermediate
Hot Dense infiltration of T cells and other immune cells; inflammatory tumor environment Angiosarcoma, UPS (Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma), Rhabdomyosarcoma More sensitive to immunotherapy High

Survival analysesshowed that patients in immune cell-rich “hot” groups had longer overall survival than patients in “cold” groups.

In particular, angiosarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma were among the subtypes known to be sensitive to immunotherapy that were found more frequently in the “hot” groups.

💡 Clinical implication: Profiling the tumor’s immune microenvironment is critical for predicting survival and identifying patients who may benefit from immunotherapy .

🚀 Future Implications and the Potential for Personalized Treatment

This comprehensive study provides important molecular insights into sarcomas, taking their rare and heterogeneous nature into account. Molecular differences between primary and metastatic tumors , when clarified, offer new clues about disease progression and mechanisms of treatment resistance .

🎯 Subtype-Specific Molecular Targets:

Subtype Prominent Molecular Target Therapeutic Potential
GIST KIT, PDGFRA Sensitive to existing KIT inhibitors. NK cell enrichment may support immunotherapy combinations.
Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma MDM2 amplification A suitable candidate for MDM2 inhibitors (e.g., milademetan).
Leiomyosarcoma mTORC1 signaling activation mTOR inhibitors (everolimus, temsirolimus) may be used.
EHE YAP1-TFE3 fusion New drugs targeting the Hypoxia/Hippo pathways are under investigation.
Rhabdomyosarcoma PAX3/7–FOXO1 fusions Strategies targeting fusion oncoproteins are under investigation.

🧬 TP53 and ATRX Mutations: These inactivating mutations, particularly common in metastatic tumors, are associated with DNA repair and chromatin structure. In this context, PARP inhibitors or epigenetic regulators may offer potential therapeutic approaches.

Whole-Genome Duplication (WGD): Common in metastatic GISTs, this condition may contribute to genetic heterogeneity and treatment resistance. CHEK1 and ATR inhibitors are among the promising options for this group.

🧪 Immunogenomic Profiling:

  • “Hot” immune groups: High T cell density (e.g., angiosarcoma, UPS) → PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors may provide benefit.
  • “Intermediate” immune group (GIST): NK cell enrichment → NK cell activators or dendritic cell vaccines may be suitable approaches.

🔬 Clinical implication: These findings create new opportunities for personalized treatment strategies and show that molecular mapping of sarcomas may guide future treatment protocols.

Sources

Soupir, A., Ospina, O.E., Hampton, O. et al. Genomic, transcriptomic, and immunogenomic landscape of over 1300 sarcomas of diverse histology subtypes. Nat Commun 16, 4206 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58678-6
DROZDOGAN AI

Explore this article together

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

DROZDOGAN AI

Drozdogan Assistant

Genomic, Transcriptomic and Immunogenomic Analysis in Sarcomas and New Therapeutic Targets

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

Conversation and privacy information

Drozdogan Assistant answers this conversation. Authorized site administrators may review it for quality. Do not share personal information.

Replies use OpenAI infrastructure. Questions and replies are processed by that service; conversation records are stored on our site. Do not share identifying, contact or personal health information.

0 / 1000

For information only; no personal diagnosis or treatment advice.

Related articles

Explore other articles on this topic.

Stay informed

Receive new articles and scientific updates by email.

Google Analytics runs on public pages independently of this window and may use analytics cookies. Your choice here controls external services only.

Cookie policy