Skip to content
Prof. Dr. Mustafa Özdoğan · Medical Oncologist

The Role of Gut Bacteria in Making Cancer Immunotherapy More Effective

The Role of Gut Bacteria in Making Cancer Immunotherapy More Effective
In this article

In the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), immunotherapies have brought a revolution in recent years. Yet the same treatment provides substantial benefit to some patients while remaining ineffective in others. Where might the source of this difference lie? Recent research points not to the lungs, but to the microbiome in our gut .

Study Design and Patient Group

In South Korea, Yonsei Cancer Center conducted a prospective study (September 2022 – November 2023) examining 92 patients . None of these patients had driver mutations such as EGFR, ALK, ROS1 , and none had previously received systemic treatment.

  • Treatment arms:
    • (1) Single-agent pembrolizumab,
    • (2) Pembrolizumab + platinum-based chemotherapy
  • PD-L1 stratification: Treatment selection was determined by PD-L1 level
  • Response definition: Tumor shrinkage or stable disease for ≥6 months
  • Sampling: Stool, blood and tumor tissue (before and during treatment)
Statistical finding: Baseline microbial composition differed significantly between responders and nonresponders (P=0.005). This difference was especially pronounced in the monotherapy arm (P=0.015).

🧬 Microbiome Signatures

🌿 Protective Signal: Faecalibacterium

In responding patients, Faecalibacterium was more abundant. This bacterium produces butyrate to protect the gut barrier, reduce inflammation and strengthen the immune system.

⚠️ Risk Signal: Lactobacillus & Escherichia

In nonresponding patients, Lactobacillus and Escherichia were present at higher proportions. These bacteria may limit immunotherapy efficacy by triggering inflammation.

📊 Numerical Findings: PFS and OS

Microbiome differences led to marked differences in patient survival:

Bacterial Group Measure High Proportion Low Proportion Difference
Faecalibacterium PFS 10.3 months 4.5 months +5.8 months
Faecalibacterium OS 21.1 months 10.4 months +10.7 months
Lactobacillus PFS 3.3 months 10.7 months −7.4 months
Lactobacillus OS 5.1 months 18 months −12.9 months

Summary: High Faecalibacterium abundance was associated with an OS advantage of +10.7 months, while high Lactobacillus abundance was associated with a disadvantage of −12.9 months.

🥗 Factors Affecting the Microbiome

  • Dietary fiber intake: High fiber ↔ more Faecalibacterium
  • Antibiotic use: Associated with lower Faecalibacterium abundance
  • Probiotic use: No significant effect detected
  • Lactobacillus: No association with diet, probiotics or antibiotics

🚀 Clinical Implications and Future Perspectives

  • Use as a biomarker: The microbiome profile may be used to predict response before treatment.
  • Intervention pathways: Dietary changes, limiting antibiotic use, experimental approaches such as FMT
  • Integrated scores: Integration of microbiome + PD-L1 + TMB + ctDNA data

Note: Randomized controlled trials are needed before these results enter clinical practice.

Conclusion

High Faecalibacterium and low Lactobacillus proportions are strongly associated with immunotherapy success in NSCLC. The gut microbiome may, in the future, serve as both a predictive biomarker and a treatment-guiding target .

📚 Source

  1. Lee, J. B. (2025). Gut microbiome signatures of clinical response to pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab with chemotherapy in treatment-naïve, metastatic KHDAK. ESMO 2025.
DROZDOGAN AI

Explore this article together

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

DROZDOGAN AI

Drozdogan Assistant

The Role of Gut Bacteria in Making Cancer Immunotherapy More Effective

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

Conversation and privacy information

Drozdogan Assistant answers this conversation. Authorized site administrators may review it for quality. Do not share personal information.

Replies use OpenAI infrastructure. Questions and replies are processed by that service; conversation records are stored on our site. Do not share identifying, contact or personal health information.

0 / 1000

For information only; no personal diagnosis or treatment advice.

Related articles

Explore other articles on this topic.

Stay informed

Receive new articles and scientific updates by email.

Google Analytics runs on public pages independently of this window and may use analytics cookies. Your choice here controls external services only.

Cookie policy