Ivonescimab in Treatment-Resistant EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer

In this article
IASLC World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC25) · HARMONi Phase 3 Study
⚠️ Why Does It Matter?
EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)has limited effective, durable options after third-generation TKIs. The PD-1/VEGF bispecific antibody known as ivonescimab, with chemotherapy, delays progression (PFS) and shows promising signals in patients with brain metastases .
Developer: Discovered and developed by the Chinese biotechnology company Akeso Inc. . International collaboration: US-based Summit Therapeutics was licensed development and marketing rights in regions including North America, Europe, and Japan.
Approval status: Akeso's first marketed bispecific PD-1/VEGF antibody, ivonescimab, was approved in 2024 by China's NMPA for EGFR-mutant NSCLC. It is not yet approved elsewhere, including by the FDA or EMA. However, its potential benefit earned FDA Fast Track designation.
With its mechanism and clinical results, ivonescimab has important NSCLC potential and may find a place particularly after TKIs once global approvals are completed.

🧪 Study Design (HARMONi, Phase 3)
- Population: 438 advanced/metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients
- Randomization (1:1): Ivonescimab (20 mg/kg Q3W) + carboplatin/pemetrexed (4 cycles, then pemetrexed ± ivonescimab maintenance) vs Placebo + carboplatin/pemetrexed
- Stratification: Brain metastasis status; region (Asia vs NA/EU)
- Primary endpoints: PFS (IRRC), OS
- Secondary endpoints: ORR, DoR, safety/tolerability
📊 Main Findings
| Outcome | Ivonescimab + Chemotherapy | Placebo + Chemotherapy | HR (95% CI) | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFS (Primary) | 6.8 months | 4.4 months | 0.52 (0.41–0.66) | <0.0001 |
| OS (Primary) | 16.8 months | 14.0 months | 0.79 (0.62–1.01) | 0.0570 |
| ORR (IRRC) | 45% | 34% | – | – |
| DoR (Median) | 7.6 months (5.5–10.6) | 4.2 months (2.9–4.7) | – | – |
| Disease Control Rate (DCR) | 84% | 73% | – | – |
Additional signal: In patients with brain metastases, intracranial PFS HR ≈ 0.34. Although OS did not cross the statistical threshold overall, a nominally significant trend in the Western cohort was reported (HR ≈ 0.78; p≈0.0332).
⚠️ Safety (TRAEs)
- Any grade: 95% vs 93%
- Grade ≥3: 50% vs 42%
- Grade ≥3 VEGF-related: 7.3% vs 3.2%
- Grade ≥3 irAEs: 9.6% vs 6.0%
- <1% serious bleeding; no new safety signals
🔍 Clinical Commentary and Impact
- A 48% progression-risk reduction in PFS (HR 0.52) is clinically meaningful and consistent.
- OS is borderlineoverall; longer Western follow-up shows a nominal significance trend.
- In patients with brain metastases, clear intracranial benefit may be valuable in real-world practice.
- Safety remains manageable with expected VEGF and immune-related toxicities under appropriate management.
Underlying message: Unlike previous negative PD-1 + chemotherapy trials (KEYNOTE-789, CheckMate-722), these results suggest dual PD-1 + VEGF targeting could become a new second-line standard candidate.
Sources
2. Ivonescimab plus chemotherapy demonstrates statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer after EGFR TKI therapy in global study. News release. Summit Therapeutics. May 30, 2025. Accessed September 7, 2025. https://www.smmttx.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/2025_PR_0530-_-HARMONi-Data-_-FINAL.docx.pdf
3. Phase III study of AK112 for NSCLC patients. ClincialTrials.gov. Updated October 8, 2024. Accessed September 7, 2025. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06396065
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps us improve our content.





Reader comments
Share your comment
Your name and comment are published only after administrator approval. Your email address is never shown to visitors.
Be the first to comment.