Skip to content
Prof. Dr. Mustafa Özdoğan · Medical Oncologist

Is One Dose of HPV Vaccine Enough? What Does the ESCUDDO Study Published in NEJM Tell Us?

Is One Dose of HPV Vaccine Enough? What Does the ESCUDDO Study Published in NEJM Tell Us?
In this article

The leading cause of cervical cancer is infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV vaccines are among our most powerful tools for preventing this cancer and its related lesions. However, one of the biggest practical challenges is this: Multidose vaccination schedules are difficult to implement, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

On December 3, 2025, a large clinical study published in NEJM(ESCUDDO Phase 3 trial) provided a crucial answer to this question: One dose of HPV vaccine is no worse than two doses; it provides equally effective protection over time. This finding could transform efforts to reduce HPV-related cancers worldwide.

What does this article explain?
We explain the results of the ESCUDDO study showing that one dose of HPV vaccine is not inferior to two doses in protection , including the numerical data and what they mean in practice.

Why does it matter?
Because reducing the number of dosescan make vaccines more accessible to millions of girls and young people, reducing costs and logistical barriers and opening a new chapter in preventing HPV-related cancers.

Single-Dose HPV Infographic Is One Dose of HPV Vaccine Enough What Does the ESCUDDO Study Published in NEJM Tell Us NEJM

Why Are Fewer Doses of HPV Vaccine Being Discussed?

For many years, HPV vaccines have been administered in schedules of 2 or 3 doses , providing very strong protection. However, particularly in low- and middle-income countries:

  • Difficulty returning for appointments,
  • Transportation and organizational challenges,
  • The cost of vaccination programs

mean that completion rates for these multidose schedules are below the desired level. Observational studies and smaller trials in recent years suggested that even a single dose could provide very strong protection . From 2022 onward, the World Health Organization also began accepting schedules of 1 or 2 doses for certain age groups. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

However, the gold standard in this field would be a clear answer from a large, randomized clinical trial. This is exactly what the ESCUDDO trial does: Is one dose inferior to two doses or not? It directly tests this question.

The ESCUDDO Study: Who Received Which Vaccine, and How Many Doses?

The study is a very large randomized clinical trial involving 20,330 girls aged 12–16 years .

  • Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio into four arms :
    • Bivalent HPV vaccine – one dose
    • Bivalent HPV vaccine – two doses
    • Nonavalent HPV vaccine – one dose
    • Nonavalent HPV vaccine – two doses
  • For comparison, 3005 unvaccinated adolescent girls were also enrolled in a separate observational survey group.

The main focus was infection with HPV16 and HPV18 , the two most important HPV types responsible for cervical cancer:

Primary endpoint:
HPV infection arising between month 12 and month 60, persisting for at least 6 months , involving HPV16 or HPV18.

To determine whether one dose was noninferior—no worse than two doses by an acceptable margin— the researchers set a threshold for the difference in infections: It must be no worse than a difference of 1.25 infections per 100 people.

Is One Dose Worse Than Two? No.

Noninferiority analysis clearly shows that one dose is not inferior to two doses:

  • Bivalent vaccine: One-dose minus two-dose difference −0.13 infections / 100 people (meaning there were actually slightly fewer infections in the one-dose arm)
    95% CI: −0.45 to 0.15. The entire interval is well below the 1.25 threshold.
  • Nonavalent vaccine: One-dose minus two-dose difference +0.21 infections / 100 people
    95% CI: −0.09 to 0.51—also much better than the 1.25 threshold. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}

The researchers can draw the following statistical conclusion: With P < 0.001, one dose is noninferior to two doses for both vaccines. In other words, there are no data to suggest that one dose is substantially worse; instead, protection levels are practically the same.

Vaccine Efficacy: 97% and Above

The vaccinated groups were also compared with girls who remained unvaccinated during the same period. The result:

  • In each of the four vaccine arms, vaccine efficacy was at least 97%.
  • For HPV16/18 infections, this means a risk reduction of more than 97% for HPV infection compared with the unvaccinated group.

This does more than show that one dose is close to two doses; it also clearly demonstrates that a single dose provides very strong protection in its own right .

Safety: Fewer Doses Do Not Add Side Effects

Throughout the study, no serious safety concerns were reported. In particular, regarding severe (Grade ≥3) adverse events :

  • Rates of severe adverse events in the one-dose and two-dose arms were similar.
  • There was also no clear safety difference between the vaccine types (bivalent and nonavalent).

In other words, the single-dose strategy does not require an additional safety trade-off. This offers a major advantage for public health programs: fewer doses + similar protection + similar side-effect profile.

Single-Dose HPV Vaccination: What Could It Change in the Fight Against Cervical Cancer?

HPV vaccination provides individual protection and, when widely used, can establish herd immunity , dramatically reducing cervical cancer incidence. Equivalent protection from one dose and two doses could be transformative in the following areas:

  • Vaccine access: Single-dose schedules make vaccination programs more feasible , even in hard-to-reach areas.
  • Cost: Fewer doses could reduce countries' vaccination costs and logistical burden substantially reduce.
  • Adherence: The pressure of having to return for a second dose decreases, and even one appointment can provide high protection .

The World Health Organization aims to eliminate HPV-related cervical cancer worldwide. The apparent strength of single-dose protection is considered a development that could shorten this process by years . :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

A Forward-Looking Perspective for Türkiye and Neighboring Countries

Among the most common topics in discussions about HPV vaccination in Türkiye and neighboring countries are cost and program feasibility. The ESCUDDO study tells us:

  • Even a single-dose program could provide protection against HPV16/18, the main causes of cervical cancer, that is extremely high protection .
  • For countries struggling to plan vaccination programs because of budget and logistical constraints, a simpler, powerful option is emerging.
  • Evidence of this quality provides an important scientific foundation for updating and strengthening national immunization programs in the coming years.

Of course, each country's vaccination schedule is shaped by local epidemiology, resources, existing programs, and health authorities' assessments . However, the clinical message is clear: Single-dose HPV vaccination has emerged as a strong and safe strategy, particularly against HPV16 and 18.

Conclusion: Fewer Doses, More Protection?

The ESCUDDO study sends a clear and powerful message: One dose of HPV vaccine is not inferior to two doses in protection, and this conclusion rests on high-quality clinical evidence involving tens of thousands of young people.

In the coming years, HPV vaccination schedules may be reshaped, with more countries considering single-dose strategies. This shift could be an important milestone toward consigning cervical cancer and other HPV-related cancers to history .

Source

Kreimer AR, Porras C, Liu D, et al. Noninferiority of One HPV Vaccine Dose to Two Doses. New England Journal of Medicine. Publication date: December 3, 2025. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2506765.

DROZDOGAN AI

Explore this article together

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

DROZDOGAN AI

Drozdogan Assistant

Is One Dose of HPV Vaccine Enough? What Does the ESCUDDO Study Published in NEJM Tell Us?

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

Conversation and privacy information

Drozdogan Assistant answers this conversation. Authorized site administrators may review it for quality. Do not share personal information.

Replies use OpenAI infrastructure. Questions and replies are processed by that service; conversation records are stored on our site. Do not share identifying, contact or personal health information.

0 / 1000

For information only; no personal diagnosis or treatment advice.

Related articles

Explore other articles on this topic.

Stay informed

Receive new articles and scientific updates by email.

Google Analytics runs on public pages independently of this window and may use analytics cookies. Your choice here controls external services only.

Cookie policy