Why Are Colorectal Cancers Different in Young People? New Cell Atlas Published in Nature Medicine

In this article
Colorectal Cancer at a Young Age: The First Large Cell Atlas That Looks Inside the Tumor
Colon and rectal (colorectal) cancer is rising in people under 50 in many countries, and the reason is still not fully understood. A study published in Nature Medicine on October 29, 2026, approached the question from the side of tumor biology. Researchers examined more than 850,000 cell nuclei, one by one, in 189 tumors from patients aged 29 to over 90, and produced a map of how tumors change with age. In the most common subtype, younger patients' tumors had more support (stromal) cells, higher long non-coding RNA activity and patterns of cell-to-cell communication linked to the spread of cancer cells into surrounding tissue. These findings do not explain the rise, nor do they prove that the differences make the disease more aggressive; but they offer a new roadmap for research. We covered the broader picture in our articles on the rise in cancer under 50, colorectal cancer in children and adolescents and lowering the screening age to 45.
- What was done? More than 850,000 cell nuclei from 189 colorectal tumors (54 from patients under 50) were analyzed at single-cell resolution; age was treated as a continuous measure rather than split into two groups, and tumor location, stage, sex and prior treatment were taken into account.
- What was found? In the most common subtype, younger patients' tumors had a higher proportion of support cells; this finding was confirmed in two separate datasets of 564 and 712 tumors. In younger patients, long non-coding RNA activity was higher and communication signals that support cell movement were stronger.
- What was not found? The study did not solve the cause of the rise and did not prove that the differences lead to more aggressive disease. Because few immune cells were captured, immune differences could not be assessed.
- What does it mean for you? Treatment and screening do not change for now. In young people, rectal bleeding, a change in bowel habits or unexplained iron deficiency should always be evaluated; screening is recommended from age 45, and genetic testing for inherited risk is recommended for everyone diagnosed before 50.
Why does this matter?
According to the American Cancer Society, colorectal cancer diagnoses in people under 50 in the US rose by 2.9% per year between 2013 and 2022, and colorectal cancer has become the leading cause of cancer-related loss of life in this age group. A similar rise is being seen in many countries in Europe, Australia and Asia. Young patients are often diagnosed at a more advanced stage, because neither patients nor doctors think of cancer first at this age, and symptoms are attributed to common problems such as hemorrhoids.
The rise is most often discussed in terms of diet, obesity, physical inactivity and the gut microbiota. But another question was also waiting for an answer: is the tumor that develops in young people biologically the same disease as the tumor in older people? As Kimmie Ng of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute puts it, survival in patients under 35 in particular may be no better than in patients in their 40s or 60s, despite more intensive treatment and better overall health. This strengthens the idea that the tumor itself may be different.
Is bowel cancer biologically different in young people?
The new findings suggest that at least some colorectal cancers that develop in young people may be biologically different. In the 189-tumor atlas published in Nature Medicine, younger patients' tumors showed more support cells, higher long non-coding RNA activity and cell communication linked to spread. However, it has not yet been proven that these differences cause the disease or a more aggressive course.
How was the study done?
Researchers from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Mass General Brigham and the Broad Institute (first author Caroline Porter; senior authors Ana C. Anderson, Kimmie Ng and Ramnik J. Xavier) analyzed tumors from 189 patients who had surgery at Brigham and Women's Hospital and whose tissue had been stored frozen. Of these patients, 54 were diagnosed before age 50 and 135 at age 50 or older. The method used was single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq), which also works on frozen tissue: the RNA in each cell nucleus is read separately to determine which genes are active, how active they are and which type the cell belongs to (what is RNA sequencing?).
Figure 1 · How is single-nucleus RNA sequencing done?
Four steps from frozen tissue to a cell map
The study has an important methodological difference: instead of splitting patients into "under 50" and "50 and over," the researchers looked for features that change gradually with age. Tumor location, stage, the patient's sex and whether the patient had received treatment before surgery were accounted for statistically. This was an attempt to remove some of the factors that had blurred the results of earlier, smaller studies.
Three main findings
1. More support cells in younger patients' tumors
A tumor is not made up of cancer cells alone; it is surrounded by a "microenvironment" of connective tissue cells (fibroblasts), blood vessels and immune cells. In the atlas, in the most common subtype of colorectal cancer, the ratio of support (stromal) cells to cancer cells was significantly higher in younger patients' tumors. This finding was also confirmed in a separate gene activity dataset of 564 tumors and by computer analysis of stained tissue images from 712 tumors. In other solid tumors, stroma-rich tumors have been found to be more resistant to chemotherapy; however, this study did not directly test for such resistance in colorectal cancer.
Figure 2 · Inside the tumor: cancer cells and support cells
A schematic comparison between age 50 and over and under 50
The finding was tested in three separate datasets
Number of tumors. Main atlas and two validation datasets.
The higher proportion of support (stromal) cells in young people was also seen in two independent datasets. The long non-coding RNA and cell-to-cell communication findings rely on the main atlas alone.
2. Higher "dark" RNA activity
Younger patients' tumors showed higher activity of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which do not make proteins but can regulate how genes work. Some of these RNAs appeared again and again across different types of cancer cells. The researchers emphasize that most of them are "dark" RNAs whose function is not yet known. For this reason, the finding is only a clue for now: what each RNA does in the tumor needs to be investigated in separate experiments.
3. Cell communication linked to spread
Cells "talk" to each other through signaling molecules and the receptors that recognize them. In younger patients' tumors, gene activity patterns suggested stronger cell-to-cell communication that could support cancer cells in moving and advancing into surrounding tissue. This is an inference drawn from gene activity; it has not been shown experimentally that the signals actually increase spread.
Figure 3 · Two signals that appear stronger in young people
Cell-to-cell communication and long non-coding RNA activity
Figure 4 · What the study showed and what it did not
How to read the findings correctly
Why should the findings be interpreted with caution?
- Association, not cause: The atlas shows features that change with age; it does not prove that these features make cancer appear earlier or progress faster. The researchers themselves stress this point.
- Tissue from a single center: The main atlas comes from a single hospital biobank and from patients who were able to have surgery. Fifty-four young patients is a large number for single-cell research but a limited one for representing all young patients.
- Immune cells underrepresented: The method captured relatively few immune cells; this study cannot tell whether the immune response differs in young people.
- No link to survival: The relationship of the findings to treatment response or survival was not tested in this study.
- Causes not investigated: The link between these tumor features and factors such as diet-related chemicals and gut microbes needs to be examined separately.
So what is causing the rise in young people?
There is no definitive answer; most likely, several factors play a role together. The fact that the rise is most pronounced in later-born generations points to exposures that begin in childhood and adolescence.
- Lifestyle and diet: Obesity, physical inactivity, sugary drinks, red and processed meat and ultra-processed foods have been linked to increased risk (lifestyle and colorectal cancer).
- Gut microbiota: In a 981-genome study published in Nature in 2025, the mutational signature of colibactin, a toxin produced by some E. coli strains, was found 3.3 times more often in people diagnosed before 40 than in those diagnosed after 70; these mutations are thought to arise in the first decade of life (microbiota and colorectal cancer).
- Heredity: About 16% of patients diagnosed before 50, or roughly 1 in 6, carry an inherited gene change such as Lynch syndrome. For this reason, genetic counseling and genetic testing for inherited risk are recommended for every patient in this age group (hereditary cancers, germline variant analysis).
- Tumor biology: The new atlas offers a cell-level starting point for investigating what kind of mark the factors above may be leaving in the tumor.
Figure 5 · Possible causes of the rise
Lifestyle, microbiota, heredity and tumor biology
Risk rises with later birth year
Risk of colon and rectal cancer at the same age, fold relative to people born around 1950 (US, Siegel 2017).
The rise shows a "birth-cohort" effect: later-born generations carry a higher risk when they reach the same age. This points to environmental and lifestyle factors that begin in childhood and adolescence. Absolute risk in young people is still low.
Where does the tumor occur in young people, and with what symptoms?
Colorectal cancers in young people are more often located on the left side of the large bowel (descending and sigmoid colon) and in the rectum. This is why rectal bleeding is one of the most common and most important symptoms. However, this symptom is often blamed on hemorrhoids, and diagnosis can be delayed for months (symptoms of colon and rectal cancer).
Figure 6 · Parts of the large bowel
In young people, tumors occur most often in the left colon and rectum
Figure 7 · Symptoms young adults should watch for
Age alone is no guarantee
Unexplained iron deficiency is especially important in young men and in women who do not menstruate, and should be evaluated for blood loss from the bowel. A person with symptoms may need a colonoscopy without waiting until screening age.
What can we do today?
The atlas does not immediately change treatment or screening; but it shows once again that colorectal cancer in young people is a real problem that deserves separate attention. For now, the evidence-based steps are:
- If you are at average risk, talk with your doctor about starting screening at age 45 (screening with colonoscopy, alternatives to colonoscopy).
- People with a first-degree relative who had colorectal cancer or an advanced polyp should start screening earlier, usually at age 40 or 10 years before the age at which the relative was diagnosed (polyps).
- If a fecal occult blood test (FIT) comes back positive, do not postpone colonoscopy (what to do after a positive test).
- If you have rectal bleeding, a change in bowel habits or unexplained iron deficiency, see a doctor whatever your age.
- If you were diagnosed with colorectal cancer before 50, ask for genetic counseling and genetic testing for inherited risk; the result also matters for your family.
- A healthy weight, regular physical activity, a diet rich in fiber and low in processed foods, and avoiding smoking and alcohol lower the risk (foods that lower risk, obesity and healthy diets).
- "Young people don't get colorectal cancer; bleeding is from hemorrhoids." Hemorrhoids are common, but the cause of rectal bleeding should be clarified by examination; delayed diagnosis is common in young patients.
- "This study found the cause of cancer in young people." No. The atlas shows biological differences in younger patients' tumors; it does not explain the cause of the rise.
- "Colon cancer in young people is definitely more aggressive." This has not yet been proven. Young patients are diagnosed at a more advanced stage; whether the biological differences found affect the course of the disease needs further research.
- "Poor diet alone is to blame." Diet is an important factor, but the microbiota, heredity, early-life exposures and tumor biology also play a role. A young person diagnosed with cancer should not blame themselves.
- "Sugar feeds tumors; cutting out sugar stops cancer." This is an oversimplification; excess sugar and obesity increase risk, but cutting out sugar is not a substitute for treatment (does sugar feed cancer?).
- "A blood test can replace colonoscopy." New blood tests may be an option, but they are not as sensitive as colonoscopy at catching polyps; a positive result requires colonoscopy (screening with a blood test).
- The Ministry of Health's national colorectal cancer screening program covers people aged 50–70: a fecal occult blood test every 2 years and a colonoscopy every 10 years. Tests are provided free of charge through KETEM (Cancer Early Diagnosis, Screening and Training Centers) and family physicians.
- People aged 45–49 fall outside the national program; in this age group, you can discuss screening with your family physician or gastroenterologist. People with a family history of colorectal cancer and people with symptoms should be evaluated without waiting for the age limit.
- Up-to-date, detailed national data on how the frequency of colorectal cancer in young people in Türkiye has changed over time are limited.
- For the general principles of early diagnosis, see our guide to early diagnosis of colon and rectal cancer and our article on what you need to know.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Why is bowel cancer rising in young people?
- The exact cause is not known. Obesity, physical inactivity, processed foods, the gut microbiota (e.g., colibactin-producing bacteria), heredity and early-life exposures may all play a role together. The fact that the rise is most pronounced in later-born generations points to factors that begin in childhood and adolescence.
- Is bowel cancer in young people biologically different?
- New findings suggest that it may be. In a 189-tumor single-cell atlas, tumors of the most common subtype in younger patients showed more support cells, higher long non-coding RNA activity and cell communication linked to spread. Whether these differences affect the course of the disease is not yet known.
- What are the symptoms of colorectal cancer in young people?
- The most common symptoms are rectal bleeding, a change in bowel habits (diarrhea, constipation, narrow stools), persistent abdominal pain and unexplained iron-deficiency anemia. If these symptoms last longer than a few weeks, see a doctor regardless of age.
- At what age should I start colon cancer screening?
- US guidelines recommend age 45 for people at average risk; in Türkiye, the national program covers ages 50–70. For people with a family history of colorectal cancer or advanced polyps, screening usually starts at age 40 or 10 years before the age at which the relative was diagnosed.
Glossary
- Early-onset colorectal cancer
- Colon or rectal cancer diagnosed before age 50.
- Single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq)
- A method that reads the RNA in each cell nucleus separately to determine cell type and gene activity; it can also be used on frozen tissue.
- Cell atlas
- A detailed map showing all the cell types in a tissue and their characteristics.
- Tumor microenvironment
- All the support cells, blood vessels, immune cells and connective tissue surrounding cancer cells.
- Stromal (support) cell
- Cells in a tumor that are not cancer cells and that form connective tissue and blood vessel structures; the most important are fibroblasts.
- Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA)
- Long RNA molecules that do not make proteins but can regulate how genes work.
- Birth-cohort effect
- Higher disease risk at the same age in later-born generations.
- Colibactin
- A bacterial toxin produced by some E. coli strains that leaves a distinctive mutational signature in DNA.
- Lynch syndrome
- The most common hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome, which raises the risk of many cancers, especially colorectal and uterine cancer.
DROZDOGAN Academy Commentary
We usually talk about the rise in colorectal cancer among young people in terms of "what we eat and how we live." This atlas lets us ask the same question from inside the tumor: the tumor in a young patient may not be a small copy of the one in an older patient, but a tissue with its own distinct features.
⚡ Why it matters
Mapping age-related tumor features at single-cell resolution, and as a continuous measure, lays the first systematic groundwork for searching for new treatment targets and risk markers specific to young people.
✅ Strengths
One of the largest datasets in the field, with more than 850,000 cell nuclei; an analysis that examines the gradual effect of age; adjustment for tumor location, stage, sex and prior treatment; and confirmation of the support cell finding in two independent datasets.
⚠️ Limitations
A single-center main atlas, a relatively small number of young patients, few captured immune cells and no link to survival data. The findings show associations; cause and effect and clinical significance are not yet known.
🩺 In practice
We take symptoms seriously in our young patients, recommend genetic counseling and genetic testing for inherited risk to every patient diagnosed before 50, and plan early screening for those with a family history. For now, treatment is chosen not by age but by stage and the molecular features of the tumor.
❓ Open questions
Are support cell–rich tumors in young people more resistant to chemotherapy? What do "dark" RNAs do in the tumor? How are factors such as diet, the microbiota and colibactin connected to these tumor features? Could these differences help identify young people at risk in advance?
Verdict: The new single-cell atlas provides strong clues that colorectal cancer in young people may be biologically different; but it does not explain the cause of the rise or a more aggressive course. What needs to be done today has not changed: take symptoms seriously, discuss screening at 45 and offer genetic testing for inherited risk to everyone diagnosed before 50.
- This article was prepared in October 2026.
- Details of the study are based on the abstract of the Nature Medicine paper and on news reports citing statements from Dana-Farber, the Broad Institute and Mass General Brigham. Because the full text of the paper was not accessible, the name of the "most common subtype," the numerical values of support cell proportions and the specific RNAs and signaling pathways have not been included in this article.
- The more frequent occurrence of tumors in the left colon and rectum in young people, the rate of inherited gene changes (16%) and the birth-cohort data come not from this study but from earlier publications.
- The illustrations are schematic and not to scale. The Academy commentary is our own.
- This article is not medical advice; if you have symptoms or want to find out when you should be screened, consult your doctor.
References
- Porter CBM, et al. Insights into early-onset colorectal cancer from a single-nucleus RNA-seq atlas of colorectal cancer across the age continuum. Nat Med 2026. doi:10.1038/s41591-026-04721-y
- News-Medical. New study reveals why colorectal cancer is more aggressive in youth. October 29, 2026. news-medical.net
- STAT. New atlas of colorectal tumors sheds light on why cancers in young people are more dangerous (interview with Kimmie Ng). October 29, 2026. statnews.com
- The Boston Globe. The rise of colon cancer among young people has been a mystery. Boston experts say they now have clues. October 29, 2026. bostonglobe.com
- Scientific Frontline. Early-onset colorectal cancer tumor biology. October 2026. sflorg.com
- Díaz-Gay M, et al. Geographic and age variations in mutational processes in colorectal cancer. Nature 2025. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09025-8; UC San Diego news release. today.ucsd.edu
- Siegel RL, Fedewa SA, Anderson WF, et al. Colorectal cancer incidence patterns in the United States, 1974–2013. J Natl Cancer Inst 2017;109:djw322. doi:10.1093/jnci/djw322
- Pearlman R, Frankel WL, Swanson B, et al. Prevalence and spectrum of germline cancer susceptibility gene mutations among patients with early-onset colorectal cancer. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:464-471. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5194
- US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 2021;325:1965-1977. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.6238
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps us improve our content.




