Skip to content
Prof. Dr. Mustafa Özdoğan · Medical Oncologist

Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates – Before and After the Pandemic

Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates – Before and After the Pandemic
In this article

Although we no longer discuss it as much as before, many wounds from the COVID-19 pandemic remain unhealed. One involves serious disruption to cancer screening for early diagnosis.

JAMA Oncology published a cross-sectional US study by Allison Oakes and colleagues on 17 November 2022. They found that, as of December 2021, breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening rates had fallen sharply during the pandemic and, despite some subsequent recovery, remained below levels before the COVID-19 pandemic.

The study used nationwide US health records from January 2017 to December 2021.

Related topic: Current Cancer Screening Programmes: Which Tests Can Detect Which Cancers Early?

Key Findings

The analysis included 306 million people with a mean age of 51.5.

For breast cancer, the median quarterly screening rate fell from 8,216 per 100,000 people before the pandemic to 4,951 per 100,000 in quarter 2 of 2020 (a 40% decline). Rates rose to pre-pandemic levels by quarters 3 and 4 of 2020, then fell to 7,374 per 100,000 in 2021, with quarterly deficits ranging from 6% to 17%. With fewer screenings, reported breast cancer incidence fell by approximately 6% between 2019 and 2020 and a further 5% between 2020 and 2021.

For cervical cancer, the median quarterly screening rate fell from 5,602/100,000 before the pandemic to 3,563/100,000 in quarter 2 of 2020 (a 36% decline). Rates rose to pre-pandemic levels by quarter 3 of 2020, then fell to 4,853/100,000 in quarter 4 of 2020 and 4,246/100,000 in quarter 4 of 2021. Reported cervical cancer incidence fell by approximately 6% between 2019 and 2020 and, with an additional increase, fell by about 5% between 2020 and 2021.

For colorectal (large bowel) cancer, the median quarterly screening rate fell from 3,162/100,000 before the pandemic to 1,746/100,000 in quarter 2 of 2020 (a 45% decline). From quarter 3 of 2020 to quarter 4 of 2021, quarterly rates ranged from 2,590 to 2,861/100,000, representing 82% to 90% of the pre-pandemic level. Reported colorectal cancer incidence fell by approximately 7% between 2019 and 2020 and a further 6% between 2020 and 2021.

Overall, this cross-sectional study shows that population-based screening and diagnosis rates for three major cancers remained below pre-pandemic levels. We expect the situation in our country to be similar. Even before the pandemic, public participation in cancer screening was far below ideal.

The findings show that screening recovered quickly after the early stages of the pandemic, but longer follow-up revealed that gaps in preventive cancer screening returned and worsened. The researchers' observation indicates that cancer screening had been neglected to a substantial degree through 2021. To reduce long-term adverse outcomes such as diagnosis at more advanced stages, multiple stakeholders need to evaluate new strategies and allocate appropriate resources to increase age- and sex-appropriate cancer screening.

Sources

Oakes AH, Boyce K, Patton C, Jain S. Rates of Routine Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Before vs After the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Oncol. Published online November 17, 2022.
DROZDOGAN AI

Explore this article together

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

DROZDOGAN AI

Drozdogan Assistant

Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates – Before and After the Pandemic

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

Conversation and privacy information

Drozdogan Assistant answers this conversation. Authorized site administrators may review it for quality. Do not share personal information.

Replies use OpenAI infrastructure. Questions and replies are processed by that service; conversation records are stored on our site. Do not share identifying, contact or personal health information.

0 / 1000

For information only; no personal diagnosis or treatment advice.

Related articles

Explore other articles on this topic.

Stay informed

Receive new articles and scientific updates by email.

Google Analytics runs on public pages independently of this window and may use analytics cookies. Your choice here controls external services only.

Cookie policy