Skip to content
Prof. Dr. Mustafa Özdoğan · Medical Oncologist

The Latest Advances in the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM), a Brain Tumor

The Latest Advances in the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM), a Brain Tumor
In this article

Where Are We with Glioblastoma in 2026? A Comprehensive Guide from Diagnosis to Treatment and New Research

Glioblastoma (glioblastoma multiforme, GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Standard treatment is still maximally safe surgery, followed by radiation therapy and temozolomide; in eligible patients, electrical-field therapy called TTFields is added. The greatest change in recent years has been in diagnosis: since 2021, the diagnosis of “glioblastoma” has been used only for tumors without an IDH mutation, and treatment decisions are based on molecular testing. In this article, you will find together what the disease is, what standard treatment achieves, the options in case of recurrence, and the realistic status of new research such as CAR-T cells, vaccines, and proton therapy. the general symptoms and stages of brain tumors, molecular diagnosis and personalized treatment in glioblastoma and new treatments in 2026 for IDH-wildtype high-grade gliomas in separate articles.

Updated · October 2026
  • The article was rewritten and expanded from the beginning. The revised definition of glioblastoma under the World Health Organization (WHO) 2021 classification was added: IDH-mutant grade 4 astrocytoma is no longer considered glioblastoma; for this reason, the phrase “grade 4 brain tumor = GBM” in the previous text was corrected.
  • Evidence for standard treatment (Stupp, EF-14, CeTeG, older patients), MGMT, treatment of recurrence, and targeted therapies was added with numerical results.
  • Developments from 2025–2026 were added: the TRIDENT study, in which TTFields was started early; proton dose escalation (NRG BN001); current results from dual-target CAR-T cells; and the status of DCVax-L’s application in the United Kingdom.
  • Two statements in the previous text were updated: the results for DCVax-L come not from a phase 2 study but from a phase 3 study compared with an external control group; CAR-T cells are now being tested not only in the laboratory but also in patients.
  • Illustrations, six graphics, and three diagrams describing tumor spread, the treatment schedule, the temozolomide–MGMT relationship, and the TTFields device were added.
52%more than half of malignant primary brain tumors are glioblastoma (United States, 2018–2022)
66median age at diagnosis
20.9 monthsmedian survival when TTFields is added to standard treatment (EF-14)
48.1 monthsmedian survival with lomustine + temozolomide in selected patients with methylated MGMT (CeTeG)
Quick Answer · Physician Summary
  • Standard treatment: Maximally safe surgery, followed by 6 weeks of radiation therapy with daily temozolomide and then 6 cycles of temozolomide. This approach increased median survival from 12.1 to 14.6 months and 5-year survival from 1.9% to 9.8%.
  • Additional options: TTFields increased median survival during the maintenance period from 16.0 to 20.9 months and 5-year survival from 5% to 13%. In selected young patients in good condition with methylated MGMT, lomustine + temozolomide extended median survival from 31.4 to 48.1 months.
  • Molecular testing is essential: Markers such as IDH, MGMT, TERT, EGFR, and BRAF determine the diagnosis, expected course, and appropriate treatment. Targeted drugs may be used for rare alterations such as BRAF V600E.
  • New research: Starting TTFields at the same time as radiotherapy (TRIDENT) did not extend survival. Proton dose escalation and CAR-T cells are showing promising signals but are not yet standard. The safest route to access is an appropriate clinical trial.

Why is this topic important?

Glioblastoma accounts for 52.2% of malignant primary brain and spinal cord tumors in the United States; approximately 3.3 new diagnoses are made per 100,000 people each year, and the median age at diagnosis is 66. The disease progresses rapidly, and because tumor cells spread in a diffuse, infiltrative manner through the surrounding brain tissue, the tumor cannot be completely removed by surgery. According to U.S. cancer registries, approximately 43% of patients survive one year and 7% survive five years.

These figures represent averages; the course can vary greatly from one patient to another. Younger age, good overall condition, the ability to achieve extensive tumor removal, and MGMT methylation are associated with longer survival. In clinical studies, the proportion of patients surviving beyond five years is around 10% with standard treatment and approximately 13% when TTFields is added. Therefore, accurate molecular diagnosis, treatment planned by an experienced team, good symptom management, and access to appropriate clinical trials directly affect the course of the disease and quality of life.

First? A brief history of glioblastoma treatment
1926
The name was given
Percival Bailey and Harvey Cushing named this tumor “glioblastoma multiforme” because it appeared highly varied (multiform) under the microscope.
2005
The Stupp protocol
Adding temozolomide to radiation therapy increased median survival to 14.6 months and became the standard treatment that remains in use today. The importance of MGMT methylation was also demonstrated that year.
2009
Bevacizumab
It received accelerated approval in the United States for recurrent glioblastoma (full approval in 2017). Subsequent studies showed that it delayed progression but did not extend survival.
2015
TTFields
Electrical-field therapy received U.S. approval in 2011 for recurrent disease and in 2015 for newly diagnosed glioblastoma together with temozolomide maintenance therapy.
2021
Molecular definition
The WHO classification limited glioblastoma to IDH-wildtype tumors. In Japan, the oncolytic virus teserpaturev received conditional approval.
2024
First CAR-T responses
Tumor shrinkage within days was reported in recurrent glioblastoma with CAR-T cells targeting EGFR and IL13Rα2.
2026
Hopes under evaluation
The TRIDENT study, which started TTFields simultaneously with radiation, did not extend survival. In a dual-target CAR-T study, median survival was 12 months, and the response lasted 33 months in one patient.

What is the latest state of glioblastoma treatment?

As of 2026, standard treatment for glioblastoma is maximally safe surgery, radiation therapy together with temozolomide, followed by temozolomide maintenance and TTFields in eligible patients. Lomustine may be added in selected patients with methylated MGMT. CAR-T cells, vaccines, and proton dose escalation are promising but remain in the research stage; clinical trials are the safest way to access these treatments.

What is glioblastoma? The definition changed in 2021

Glioblastoma is a tumor originating from glial cells, the brain’s supporting cells, most commonly astrocytes. In the past, all astrocytic tumors that appeared most aggressive (grade 4) under the microscope were called glioblastoma. The WHO’s 2021 classification changed this definition: glioblastoma is now used only for adult IDH-wildtype tumors (without a mutation in the IDH gene). Tumors carrying an IDH mutation that were formerly called “secondary glioblastoma” are now considered a separate disease, IDH-mutant grade 4 astrocytoma, and their course is generally slower, with different treatment options.

There is another consequence of the new definition: an IDH-wildtype astrocytoma that appears grade 2 or 3 under the microscope is also considered and treated as glioblastoma if it carries a TERT promoter mutation, EGFR gene amplification, or gain of chromosome 7 with loss of chromosome 10 (+7/−10). Therefore, molecular testing of the tissue sample has become essential for diagnosis (next-generation sequencing (NGS)).

Figure 1 · Diffuse gliomas in adults: WHO 2021 classification

The first distinction is the IDH mutation; glioblastoma is exclusively IDH-wildtype

Adult-type diffuse gliomas (WHO 2021)first question: does the tumor have an IDH mutation? IDH-wildtype → Glioblastoma · grade 4if necrosis or microvascular proliferation is present on microscopyor if one of the following molecular findings is present: TERT promotermutation, EGFR amplification, +7/−10 chromosomal alteration IDH-mutantastrocytomagrade 2, 3, or 4no longer called GBM IDH-mutantoligodendroglioma1p/19q codeletiongrade 2 or 3 Why is this important?treatment, expected course, and appropriate clinical trialsvary according to this molecular diagnosis
Pronunciation: In adult-type diffuse gliomas, the first question is whether the tumor carries an IDH mutation. An IDH-wildtype tumor is diagnosed as glioblastoma (grade 4) if necrosis or vascular proliferation is seen under the microscope, or if it has one of the TERT, EGFR, or +7/−10 alterations. IDH-mutant tumors are classified as astrocytoma (grades 2–4) or, if they have a 1p/19q codeletion, oligodendroglioma (grades 2–3), and are no longer called glioblastoma.
Marker What does it indicate? Impact on treatment
IDH1/2 If there is no mutation (wild type): glioblastoma; if present: IDH-mutant glioma Determines the diagnosis and treatment pathway
MGMT promoter methylation Whether the DNA repair gene has been silenced; present in approximately 35–45% of patients Clear benefit from temozolomide; option to add lomustine
TERT, EGFR, +7/−10 Indicates that the tumor will behave like glioblastoma even if it appears low-grade under the microscope Treated like glioblastoma
BRAF V600E Rare (1–3%), particularly in younger patients and the epithelioid subtype Dabrafenib + trametinib option
NTRK fusion Very rare Larotrectinib or entrectinib option
H3 K27M (midline) Indicates a different type of midline tumor (diffuse midline glioma) A separate disease; dordaviprone was approved in the United States in 2025

The frequencies of markers vary among studies. The scope of molecular testing differs from center to center; check your report to see which tests were performed.

What are the symptoms of glioblastoma, and how is it diagnosed?

Symptoms generally worsen over days or weeks and vary depending on the tumor's location. The most common include:

  • Headache, particularly one that worsens in the morning and is accompanied by nausea and vomiting
  • Seizure; may be the first symptom in approximately one-quarter of patients
  • Weakness in an arm or leg, or speech or visual disturbances
  • Forgetfulness, difficulty concentrating, and changes in personality and behavior

The first step in diagnosis is a contrast-enhanced brain MRI. On MRI, glioblastoma typically appears as a mass with a necrotic center, a contrast-enhancing rim, and marked surrounding edema. Perfusion MRI, MR spectroscopy, and, at some centers, amino acid PET may provide additional information; however, a definitive diagnosis is always made by tissue examination. If the tumor is in a location where it cannot be safely removed, a sample is obtained by stereotactic needle biopsy .

Figure 2 · How does glioblastoma grow in the brain?

Necrotic center, contrast-enhancing rim, edema, and infiltrating cells

How does glioblastoma grow in the brain?contrast-enhancing tumornecrotic centeredema (swelling)infiltrating tumor cellssurgically removablemidline of the brainEven if the visible mass is removed, infiltrating cells remaintherefore, radiation and drug therapy are required after surgery
Pronunciation: There is a necrotic center in the middle of the tumor and a contrast-enhancing rim surrounding it; edema (yellow area) is present around it. The purple dots represent tumor cells infiltrating beyond the mass visible on MRI; some may cross the brain's midline and reach the opposite hemisphere. The dashed line indicates the portion that can be removed surgically: even if the visible mass is removed, infiltrating cells remain.

Surgery: Why is it often impossible to remove the entire tumor?

Glioblastoma cells spread into the surrounding healthy brain tissue in the form of fine extensions; tumor cells are also present beyond the boundary visible on MRI. Therefore, the goal of surgery is not to “remove everything,” but to safely remove as much of the contrast-enhancing mass as possible while preserving functions such as speech, movement, and vision. Surgery both reduces intracranial pressure and symptoms and provides sufficient tissue for molecular testing.

The amount of tumor removed is associated with survival. Therefore, methods such as 5-ALA (fluorescence-guided surgery), intraoperative MRI, neuronavigation, neuromonitoring, and awake surgery for tumors near the speech centers are used during surgery. In a randomized study of 5-ALA, the rate of complete removal of the contrast-enhancing tumor increased from 36% to 65%, and the proportion of patients alive without progression at 6 months increased from 21.1% to 41.0%. “Supramaximal” surgery, in which tissue beyond the contrast-enhancing area (the FLAIR area) is also removed, is being investigated in suitable patients; however, only provided that the risk of functional loss is not increased.

Important
  • An MRI performed within 48–72 hours after surgery shows how much tumor remains and serves as the reference point for comparison with subsequent follow-up scans.
  • Capsules placed in the cavity left by tumor removal that release chemotherapy medication (Gliadel containing carmustine) showed a small survival benefit (13.9 and 11.6 months); however, they are now rarely used because they may limit subsequent molecular testing and participation in clinical trials.

Standard postoperative treatment: the Stupp protocol

Usually 3–6 weeks after surgery, radiation therapy is administered over 6 weeks, every weekday, for a total of 30 sessions (60 Gy); during this period, temozolomide is also taken as a pill every day. After a break of approximately 4 weeks, temozolomide is continued on the first 5 days of 28-day cycles, generally for 6 cycles. This regimen is based on the phase 3 study published in 2005 and led by Roger Stupp, and it still forms the foundation of standard treatment.

Figure 3 · Schedule of standard treatment

Surgery, radiation + temozolomide, maintenance temozolomide, and TTFields

Standard treatment: approximately 9–10-month planSurgeryRadiation therapyTemozolomideTTFieldsMRI monitoringsurgery + tissue and molecular diagnosis6 weeks · 60 Gy / 30 sessionsevery day6 cycles · 5 days every 28 daysat least 18 hours per dayevery 2–3 months after radiation0410142638weeksUsually 3–6 weeks from surgery to radiation; after radiation is completedapproximately a 4-week break followed by maintenance treatment
Pronunciation: Following surgery and tissue diagnosis, radiation therapy lasting 6 weeks begins at approximately week 4; temozolomide is taken every day during this period. Approximately 4 weeks after radiation ends, the maintenance period begins: temozolomide for 5 days every 28 days (6 cycles) and, in suitable patients, TTFields for at least 18 hours per day. MRI is generally repeated every 2–3 months after radiation.
Period What is done? Points to note
Radiation + temozolomide (6 weeks) 60 Gy / 30 sessions; temozolomide 75 mg/m² every day Weekly blood count; pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis; anti-nausea medication
Interval (approximately 4 weeks) Initial assessment MRI; review of the treatment plan Growth seen in the first months may be pseudoprogression
Maintenance temozolomide 150–200 mg/m², 5 days every 28 days; generally 6 cycles Monitoring of platelets and white blood cells; take on an empty stomach or in the same manner each time
TTFields (in suitable patients) At least 18 hours per day, together with maintenance temozolomide Keep the hair shaved; skin care
Supportive care Antiseizure medication (only for those who have seizures), lowest-dose steroid when needed Signs of blood clots, mood, sleep, and fatigue

Doses are calculated according to body surface area and adjusted according to blood values. For the relationship between temozolomide and food, you can consult the fasting-with-food table for oral cancer medications .

Median survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: step by step

Months. Each study's own arms are shown side by side; gray: the comparator arm of that study.

Radiotherapy alone (Stupp 2005)
12.1 months
Radiotherapy + temozolomide (Stupp 2005)
14.6 months
Maintenance temozolomide (EF-14)
16.0 months
Maintenance temozolomide + TTFields (EF-14)
20.9 months
MGMT-methylated: temozolomide (CeTeG)
31.4 months
MGMT-methylated: lomustine + temozolomide (CeTeG)
48.1 months

Patients in EF-14 and CeTeG had completed radiotherapy or were younger and selected patients; therefore, the figures from these studies should not be read as successive stages of the same course. Comparisons between different studies are indirect; patient groups, prior treatments, and follow-up durations differ.

It is important to interpret the gains in the graph in absolute terms: in the Stupp study, adding temozolomide increased 2-year survival from 10.4% to 26.5% and 5-year survival from 1.9% to 9.8%. In other words, approximately 16 more out of every 100 patients reached 2 years, and 8 more reached 5 years. In relative terms, the risk of death decreased by approximately 37% (hazard ratio 0.63).

Proportion surviving five years

5-year survival, %. Two phase 3 studies with long-term follow-up.

Radiotherapy alone (Stupp 2009)
1.9%
Radiotherapy + temozolomide (Stupp 2009)
9.8%
Maintenance temozolomide (EF-14)
5%
Maintenance temozolomide + TTFields (EF-14)
13%

Absolute differences: with temozolomide, approximately 8 more out of every 100 patients, and with TTFields, approximately 8 more, reached 5 years. Comparisons between different studies are indirect; patient groups, previous treatments, and follow-up durations differ.

Why is MGMT so important?

Temozolomide causes damage by adding a methyl group to the tumor cell's DNA. The enzyme called MGMT can remove this methyl group and repair the damage. If the beginning region of the MGMT gene (the promoter) is silenced by methylation, less enzyme is produced, the damage cannot be repaired, and the drug is more effective. Therefore, MGMT methylation is the most important marker for predicting both the benefit from temozolomide and the course of the disease.

Figure 4 · How does temozolomide work, and why is MGMT important?

Methylated (silenced) and unmethylated (active) MGMT gene

How does temozolomide work, and why is MGMT important?Adds a methylgroup to DNAMGMT methylatedgene silencedMGMT genelittle repair enzymedamage cannot be repairedtumor cell diesMGMT unmethylatedgene activeMGMT geneabundant repair enzymedamage is repaireddrug effect decreasesMedian survival with radiotherapy + temozolomideMGMT methylated: 21.7 months · unmethylated: 12.7 monthsmethylation predicts both treatment response and course
Description: Temozolomide adds a methyl group (orange) to DNA. On the left, the MGMT gene has been silenced by methylation: There is little repair enzyme, the damage remains, and the tumor cell dies. On the right, the gene is active: The blue enzyme removes the methyl group, the DNA is repaired (green), and the drug's effect is reduced. In the MGMT analysis of the Stupp study, median survival with radiation + temozolomide was 21.7 months in methylated patients and 12.7 months in unmethylated patients.

How does MGMT status change the benefit from temozolomide?

Median survival, months (Hegi 2005; MGMT subanalysis of the Stupp study).

MGMT methylated · radiotherapy alone
15.3 months
MGMT methylated · radiotherapy + temozolomide
21.7 months
MGMT unmethylated · radiotherapy alone
11.8 months
MGMT unmethylated · radiotherapy + temozolomide
12.7 months

In the methylated group, temozolomide extended median survival by 6.4 months; in the unmethylated group, the difference was limited to 0.9 months. Nevertheless, temozolomide is still mostly part of standard treatment for unmethylated patients today.

Although the contribution of temozolomide is small in unmethylated patients, standard treatment is continued at most centers because no better alternative has been proven, and these patients are particularly directed toward clinical trials. For example, the phase 3 Gliofocus study comparing the PARP inhibitor niraparib, specifically for this group, with temozolomide is ongoing; completion of the primary data is planned for the end of 2027. MGMT is not the only cause of resistance to temozolomide: An oxygen-deprived tumor environment, stem-cell-like tumor cells, other DNA repair pathways, and epigenetic changes also play a role (Aziz Sancar's study on temozolomide resistance).

TTFields (Optune): What does electric field therapy add?

TTFields (tumor treating fields) apply low-intensity, continuously alternating electric fields through four arrays attached to the head. These fields disrupt the cell-division mechanism (the spindle structure) in dividing cells; they do not significantly affect nondividing normal brain cells. The device is portable and must be worn for at least 18 hours per day for a benefit to be seen.

Figure 5 · How does the TTFields device work?

Arrays attached to the head and a dividing tumor cell

TTFields: electric-field device worn on the headdevice4 bands attached to the headand portable deviceDividing tumor cellalternating fielddisrupts divisionAt least 18 hours per dayhead kept shavedmost common side effect:skin irritation
Description: On the left, four arrays attached to the head and a portable device connected by a cable are shown. On the right, there is a dividing tumor cell: The alternating electric field (arrows) disrupts the structure that enables the cell to divide into two. The device is worn for at least 18 hours per day, and the hair is kept shaved; the most common side effect is skin irritation beneath the arrays.

In the phase 3 EF-14 study of 695 patients who had completed radiation therapy, adding TTFields to maintenance temozolomide increased median survival from 16.0 to 20.9 months, progression-free survival from 4.0 to 6.7 months, and 5-year survival from 5% to 13%. The treatment may not be suitable for every patient because the study did not use a placebo device and because of the burden the device imposes on daily life. In the phase 3 TRIDENT study announced in June 2026, starting TTFields at the same time as radiation therapy did not prolong survival compared with starting it during the maintenance period (17.7 and 17.5 months). Thus, the place of TTFields has not changed: after radiation, together with maintenance temozolomide.

Treatment in older and patients with poorer general condition

In patients over 65 or those with a poorer general condition, the duration and burden of treatment become important. In a phase 3 study, adding temozolomide to short-course radiation (3 weeks, 40 Gy / 15 fractions) in patients over 65 extended median survival from 7.6 to 9.3 months; the difference was greater in patients with methylated MGMT (7.7 and 13.5 months). In very old or frail patients with methylated MGMT, temozolomide alone, and in unmethylated patients, short-course radiation therapy alone may be options. These decisions are based not on age but on the patient's general condition, expectations, and MGMT result.

Lomustine + temozolomide in younger patients with methylated MGMT

In the CeTeG/NOA-09 phase 3 study conducted in Germany, adding lomustine to standard temozolomide in 141 patients under 70 years of age who were in good general condition and had methylated MGMT extended median survival from 31.4 to 48.1 months. However, this was a small study, no difference in progression-free survival was observed, and side effects such as decreases in blood counts were more frequent. Therefore, some centers offer this treatment as an option for selected patients; it is not standard for everyone.

Further reading: Mechanisms of temozolomide action and resistance

Temozolomide becomes active in the body and adds a methyl group to guanine bases in DNA; the most important lesion is O6-methylguanine. As the cell attempts to repair this mismatched base, double-strand breaks form in the DNA and the cell undergoes programmed cell death (apoptosis). Because the MGMT enzyme directly repairs O6-methylguanine and prevents this process, it is the most important resistance mechanism. In addition, defects in the mismatch repair (MMR) system, a hypoxic tumor microenvironment, treatment-resistant glioma stem cells, microRNAs, and epigenetic changes can also cause resistance. After temozolomide, numerous new mutations (hypermutation) may develop in some tumors; this is important when planning treatment for recurrence. You can find more information in our article on Aziz Sancar and glioblastoma, in which we evaluate claims in this field from mouse experiments to patients. our article on Aziz Sancar and glioblastoma You can find more information.

Follow-up: Is every growth on MRI a recurrence?

After radiation therapy, MRI is generally repeated every 2–3 months. Particularly during the first 12 weeks after radiation and temozolomide have ended, the tumor may appear to have grown in approximately 20–30% of patients because of treatment-related inflammation and edema. This is called pseudoprogression ; it is more common in patients with methylated MGMT and often regresses spontaneously. Months or years later, radiation-related tissue damage (radiation necrosis) can also mimic recurrence. Therefore, the international RANO 2.0 criteria recommend confirmation with a second MRI at a short interval in the event of suspicious growth, rather than changing treatment immediately. Perfusion MRI, MR spectroscopy, amino acid PET, and, if necessary, repeat tissue sampling can help distinguish between them.

What options are available if the disease recurs?

Glioblastoma recurs in most patients after standard treatment, usually near the original tumor site. There is no single standard for treatment of recurrence; the decision is made by a multidisciplinary tumor board based on the tumor's size and location, previous treatments, the time elapsed, the patient's general condition, and preferences.

Figure 6 · Options for recurrent glioblastoma

Repeat surgery, reirradiation, drugs, targeted therapy, and clinical trials

If recurrence occurs: individualized decision by the multidisciplinary teamfirst, is it true recurrence or a treatment-related change? Repeat surgerythat can be safely removedin limited recurrence;provides a new tissue diagnosis Repeat radiationin a small, limited area;stereotactic orshort-course radiation Drugslomustine, temozolomideagain, bevacizumab;others in selected patients Targeted therapysuch as BRAF V600E and NTRKrare alterationappropriate drug if present A clinical trial should be considered at every stagesupportive and palliative care continue alongside all options
In brief: At recurrence, true recurrence must first be distinguished from treatment-related changes. In a limited recurrence that can be safely removed, repeat surgery both reduces symptoms and provides tissue for new molecular testing. Reirradiation may be used for small areas; drugs may include lomustine, temozolomide rechallenge, and bevacizumab; if a rare molecular alteration is present, targeted drugs may be used. Clinical trials should be asked about at every stage, and supportive and palliative care should proceed alongside all options.
Option Who should it be considered for? What does the evidence say?
Repeat surgery Symptomatic recurrence that can be safely removed Randomized evidence is limited; benefit and new tissue diagnosis in selected patients
Reirradiation Small, limited recurrence; a long time after the initial radiation In RTOG 1205, adding it to bevacizumab delayed progression but did not extend survival (radiosurgery)
Lomustine Most commonly used drug at recurrence; every 6 weeks Comparator arm in most studies; median survival of 8–9 months
Temozolomide rechallenge Patients with methylated MGMT who recur long after completing temozolomide Phase 2 data; beneficial in selected patients
Bevacizumab Marked edema, high steroid requirement Delays progression and may reduce steroid use; does not extend survival (what is bevacizumab?)
Regorafenib An option in some countries (e.g., Italy) Positive in the small phase 2 REGOMA study; not confirmed in the subsequent study
Clinical trial Should be considered for every patient with recurrence The safest way to access new treatments

Median survival in recurrent glioblastoma

Months. The arms of each study are shown side by side; gray: comparator arm.

Lomustine (EORTC 26101)
8.6 months
Lomustine + bevacizumab (EORTC 26101)
9.1 months
Bevacizumab (CheckMate 143)
10.0 months
Nivolumab (CheckMate 143)
9.8 months
Lomustine (REGOMA)
5.6 months
Regorafenib (REGOMA)
7.4 months

Bevacizumab delayed disease progression (4.2 and 1.5 months) but did not significantly extend survival; nivolumab was not found to be superior to bevacizumab; REGOMA is a small phase 2 study, and the benefit of regorafenib was not confirmed in the subsequent GBM AGILE study. Comparisons between different studies are indirect; patient groups, prior treatments, and follow-up periods differ.

Targeted therapies: Who benefits?

Drugs targeting the most common genetic alterations in glioblastoma (such as EGFR amplification and PTEN loss) have not extended survival to date. Reasons include the drugs' inability to cross the blood–brain barrier sufficiently and the great genetic diversity of cells within the tumor. However, targeted therapies are a real option for a small group of patients:

  • BRAF V600E mutation: Dabrafenib + trametinib has been approved in the United States since 2022 for all solid tumors carrying this mutation. The tumor shrank in approximately one-third of patients with high-grade glioma (tumor-agnostic cancer treatments).
  • NTRK fusion: Larotrectinib and entrectinib may be used for this very rare alteration.
  • High tumor mutational burden: Unlike other cancers, hypermutated tumors that develop after temozolomide mostly do not respond to immunotherapy; therefore, this is not considered a rationale for immunotherapy alone.

Vorasidenib, used in IDH-mutant gliomas, was approved in 2024 only for grade 2 IDH-mutant astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma; it has no role in IDH-wild-type glioblastoma. This distinction demonstrates the practical importance of the 2021 classification.

Immunotherapy, vaccines, and cell therapies: A realistic picture

The brain is an organ in which immune-system activity is limited; glioblastoma also creates an environment that suppresses immune cells. Therefore, immune drugs that have achieved major success in other cancers have not produced the expected results in glioblastoma. Nevertheless, this is the area with the most intensive research (immunotherapies and cancer vaccines).

  • Immune checkpoint drugs: Nivolumab did not extend survival in either recurrent disease or newly diagnosed disease in three large phase 3 studies (CheckMate 143, 498, and 548). In patients with unmethylated MGMT, using nivolumab instead of temozolomide reduced median survival from 14.9 months to 13.4 months. In a small study of 35 patients who received pembrolizumab before surgery, median survival increased from 7.5 months to 13.7 months; this approach is being tested in larger studies.
  • Dendritic cell vaccine (DCVax-L): In a phase 3 study of 331 patients, median survival was 19.3 months in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and 13.2 months in recurrent disease. However, the results were compared not with the study's own control group but with external controls taken from other studies, and this method was strongly criticized. The company applied to the United Kingdom's medicines regulator (MHRA) in December 2023; as of August 2026, no decision had been announced.
  • Personalized peptide and mRNA vaccines: Vaccines designed from the tumor's own mutations generate immune responses in early studies; their effect on survival is not yet known (personalized peptide vaccine).
  • CAR-T cells: In 2024, marked tumor shrinkage within days after administration into the cerebrospinal fluid was reported with CAR-T cells targeting EGFR and IL13Rα2. In the dual-target CAR-T study updated at ASCO 2026, median survival among 18 patients was 12.0 months, and the proportion alive at 18 months was 28%; one patient has maintained a response for 33 months. Responses are short-lived in most patients, and transient symptoms of brain inflammation occurred in all patients (dual-target CAR-T, B7-H3-targeted CAR-T).
  • Oncolytic viruses: The genetically modified herpes virus teserpaturev, which multiplies in and destroys tumor cells, received conditional approval in Japan in 2021 after a 1-year survival rate of 84.2% in a phase 2 study of 19 patients. It is not approved in other countries.

Figure 7 · Map of glioblastoma research

Six research areas and their current status

Immunotherapy drugsPD-1 drugs in phase 3trials ineffective;preoperative trial CAR-T cellsEGFR, IL13Rα2, B7-H3;rapid shrinkage, mostlyshort-lived; phase 1 VaccinesDCVax-L under reviewin the UK; peptide andmRNA vaccines early Oncolytic virusteserpaturev conditionallyapproved in Japan;others under investigation Radiation innovationsproton dose escalation,radiation tile placedduring surgery (GammaTile) Crossing the barrierfocused ultrasound(SonoCloud-9) withcarboplatin, phase 3 None of these is yet standardthe safest route to access: an appropriate clinical trial
In brief: PD-1-targeted immune drugs showed no benefit in phase 3 studies; their use before surgery is being investigated. CAR-T cells produce rapid but often short-lived shrinkage. DCVax-L is under review in the United Kingdom, and personalized vaccines are at an early stage. The oncolytic virus teserpaturev has conditional approval only in Japan. Proton dose escalation and radiation tiles placed during surgery are being tested in radiation therapy, while methods of opening the blood–brain barrier with ultrasound are being tested for drug delivery. None of these is yet standard.

Innovations in radiation therapy and drug delivery

Proton therapy: In the proton arm of the phase 2 NRG BN001 study (193 patients), increasing the dose from 60 Gy to 75 Gy increased median survival from 22.0 months to 22.8 months and 2-year survival from 43.1% to 49.9%; however, the difference did not reach the threshold for statistical significance, and dose escalation with photon radiation showed no benefit in the same study. The result was considered a “signal,” and a phase 3 study is being planned.

Radiation tiles placed during surgery (GammaTile): Small radiation sources placed in the cavity after tumor removal start radiation immediately, without waiting for wound healing. In the 67-patient GESTALT study, rapid regrowth before radiation began occurred in only 6% of patients (50–70% in previous series); the comparison is indirect, and the randomized phase 3 BRIDGES study has begun (GammaTile in brain metastases).

Opening the blood–brain barrier: An ultrasound device implanted in the skull (SonoCloud-9) temporarily opens the barrier before each drug administration, enabling drugs such as carboplatin, which normally penetrate the brain poorly, to reach the tumor. The phase 3 SONOBIRD study of 560 patients, comparing this method with standard chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma, is still recruiting patients.

2025–2026: Results of two major studies

Median survival, months. Gray: standard arm.

TTFields started during maintenance (TRIDENT)
17.5 months
TTFields started with radiotherapy (TRIDENT)
17.7 months
Proton 60 Gy (NRG BN001)
22.0 months
Proton 75 Gy (NRG BN001)
22.8 months

TRIDENT (981 patients, phase 3) did not reach its primary endpoint (hazard ratio 0.95). The proton arm of NRG BN001 (193 patients, phase 2) showed 49.9% rather than 43.1% 2-year survival, but remained below the threshold for statistical significance; this needs to be confirmed in a phase 3 study. Comparisons between different studies are indirect; patient groups, prior treatments, and follow-up durations differ.

Taking part in a clinical trial

In glioblastoma, the safest way to access new treatments is through clinical trials with scientific and ethical approval. Most trials recruit patients immediately after surgery for a new diagnosis or at the first recurrence; therefore, the clinical-trial option should be discussed at the beginning of treatment. We have a separate article about the risks and potential benefits of phase 1 studies available .

Managing symptoms and quality of life

Glioblastoma treatment is not limited to tumor-directed therapy; effective symptom management directly affects both quality of life and the ability to continue treatment.

  • Brain edema and steroids: Edema around the tumor increases headaches and neurological symptoms. increases headaches and neurological symptoms. Dexamethasone should be used at the lowest effective dose and for the shortest possible time; long-term use at high doses increases the risk of muscle weakness, high blood sugar, and infection.
  • Seizures: In patients who have had seizures, medications with few drug interactions, such as levetiracetam, are preferred. Preventive antiseizure medication is generally not recommended in patients who have never had a seizure. Consult your doctor about driving restrictions after a seizure.
  • Risk of blood clots: The risk of blood clots in the legs and lungs is high in glioblastoma; swelling and pain in the leg or sudden shortness of breath requires urgent evaluation.
  • Fatigue, thinking, and memory: Fatigue is very common. Cognitive rehabilitation and mental exercises may support daily functioning.
  • Rehabilitation and movement: Physical, speech, and occupational therapy should be planned from the time of diagnosis (exercise and rehabilitation in patients with brain tumors).
  • Psychological support and caregivers: Depression and anxiety are common among patients and their loved ones; personality changes can also be challenging for the family. Psychological support and caregiver support should be part of treatment. Fear of recurrence can also be addressed separately.
  • Palliative care: Palliative care is not only end-of-life care; from the time of diagnosis, it strengthens symptom management, decision-making processes, and family support (access to palliative care).

Questions you can ask your doctor

  • What are the IDH, MGMT, TERT, EGFR, and BRAF results for my tumor? Was comprehensive molecular testing performed?
  • How much of the tumor could be removed? Is there residual tumor on the postoperative MRI?
  • What will my radiotherapy and temozolomide plan be? Are TTFields suitable for me?
  • Based on my MGMT result, should lomustine be added, or is another option available?
  • Is there a clinical trial I can participate in? Should we discuss this now or at recurrence?
  • How often will follow-up MRIs be performed? How will we assess the possibility of pseudoprogression?
  • Which symptoms should prompt me to call immediately? How should I use my steroid and antiseizure medication?
Common misconceptions
  • "A biopsy or surgery spreads the tumor." No. Obtaining a tissue diagnosis and performing the safest, most extensive resection possible are the foundations of treatment; the correct treatment cannot be selected without a diagnosis.
  • "If MGMT is unmethylated, treatment is pointless." Incorrect. Radiotherapy is a fundamental treatment in both groups; patients with unmethylated tumors are also priority candidates for clinical trials.
  • "The more steroids, the better." No. Dexamethasone rapidly reduces symptoms, but high-dose and long-term use causes serious side effects; the lowest effective dose is targeted.
  • "If the mass has shrunk on MRI after bevacizumab, the disease has regressed." Not always. Because the drug reduces leakage from blood vessels, contrast enhancement may decrease (pseudoresponse); the tumor may be progressing at the same time.
  • "A ketogenic diet or sugar-free eating treats glioblastoma." This has not been proven. Small studies are exploratory; do not begin such a diet without discussing it with your team because of the risk of weight loss and malnutrition.
  • "Cannabis oil or herbal products shrink the tumor." This has not been demonstrated in patients; some interact with medications and antiseizure drugs.
  • "A new treatment reported in the news is immediately available." Most new approaches are in early-phase clinical trials; access is possible only through these studies.
The situation in Türkiye
  • The standard treatment consisting of surgery, radiotherapy, and temozolomide is widely administered in Türkiye and is covered by SGK.
  • Bevacizumab is not licensed for glioblastoma in Europe; in Türkiye, your treatment team should check the licensing and reimbursement status of this use. The legal avenues available for unpaid medications are the subject of a separate article.
  • Access to and reimbursement conditions for the TTFields device and certain medications such as lomustine vary; some medications may be obtained through obtaining medications from abroad .
  • Comprehensive molecular tests (IDH, MGMT, TERT, EGFR, BRAF, and NGS) may not be available at every center; ask which tests were performed on your tissue sample.
  • Only a limited number of international clinical trials accepting patients with glioblastoma are available in Türkiye; research databases can be searched with your team to identify a suitable trial.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can glioblastoma be completely cured?
At present, glioblastoma is a disease that cannot be completely cured in most patients; however, the disease can be controlled with treatment and survival can be prolonged. With standard treatment, approximately 10% of patients survive beyond 5 years, compared with approximately 13% when TTFields is added. Younger age, good general condition, extensive surgery, and MGMT methylation are associated with longer survival.
How long does treatment last after surgery?
Three to six weeks after surgery, radiation therapy is administered for 6 weeks together with temozolomide every day. After an interval of approximately 4 weeks, temozolomide is generally given for 5 days every 28 days for 6 cycles; in eligible patients, TTFields is used together with it. The total duration is usually 9–10 months.
Is TTFields suitable for everyone?
TTFields prolonged survival in patients who had completed radiation therapy and were receiving maintenance temozolomide. It must be worn for at least 18 hours a day, the hair must be kept shaved, and the device must be carried; therefore, it is evaluated together with the patient's lifestyle and preferences. The TRIDENT study did not show an additional benefit from starting it at the same time as radiation therapy.
What is done if glioblastoma recurs?
First, it is determined whether the growth seen on MRI represents true recurrence or a treatment-related change. Options include repeat surgery, repeat radiation therapy, lomustine, retreatment with temozolomide, bevacizumab, targeted drugs for rare molecular alterations, and clinical trials. The decision is made individually by the tumor board.

Glossary

Glioblastoma (GBM)
The most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults; since 2021, only IDH-wildtype grade 4 tumors.
IDH-wildtype
The absence of mutations in the IDH1 and IDH2 genes; a fundamental condition for the diagnosis of glioblastoma.
MGMT promoter methylation
Silencing of the DNA-repair gene MGMT; it predicts the benefit from temozolomide and the disease course.
Stupp protocol
The standard treatment consisting of 6 weeks of radiation therapy with daily temozolomide, followed by 6 cycles of maintenance temozolomide.
TTFields (tumor-treating fields)
A low-intensity electric-field treatment applied with transducer arrays worn on the head that disrupts the division of dividing cells.
5-ALA
A substance taken orally before surgery that makes tumor cells appear bright under microscope light; it enables more extensive resection.
Pseudoprogression
The appearance of tumor growth on MRI during the first months after treatment due to treatment-related inflammation and edema.
Radiation necrosis
Tissue damage that may develop months or years after radiation therapy and can mimic recurrence.
RANO
International criteria used to evaluate treatment response and progression in brain tumors.
CAR-T cell
A cell therapy obtained by modifying the patient's own T cells in the laboratory so that they recognize a specific target in the tumor.
Blood–brain barrier
A blood-vessel-wall structure that protects the brain from harmful substances in the blood while also limiting the passage of many drugs into the brain.

DROZDOGAN Academy Commentary

The gains made in glioblastoma over the past twenty years consist of small steps; however, when these steps are added together, median survival in an appropriate patient has approached two years from one year. The most important message of 2026: Accurate molecular diagnosis, an experienced team, and early access to clinical research are more decisive than news of a single new drug.

⚡ Why it matters

The 2021 classification changed the diagnosis of glioblastoma; some of the patients labeled as having “glioblastoma” in older studies are now considered to have IDH-mutant astrocytoma. This distinction needs to be known so that patients can correctly understand their own situation.

✅ Strengths

The components of standard treatment (temozolomide, TTFields, and short-course radiation in older adults) are supported by long-term randomized phase 3 studies, and their absolute benefits have been clearly measured.

⚠️ Limitations

There is no treatment proven to prolong survival in recurrent disease. CAR-T, vaccine, and proton data come from small, early-stage, or externally controlled studies. The TRIDENT and NRG BN001 results have not yet been fully published in a peer-reviewed journal.

🩺 In practice

For every patient, we recommend extensive molecular testing, a tumor board decision involving neurosurgery, radiation oncology, and medical oncology, discussion of TTFields and clinical-trial options from the time of diagnosis, and early planning of rehabilitation and palliative care.

❓ Open questions

How can the responses to CAR-T cells be made durable? Will a better option than temozolomide be found for patients without MGMT methylation? Will proton dose escalation be validated in phase 3? Could methods that open the blood–brain barrier give old drugs a new lease on life?

Conclusion: The standard treatment for glioblastoma in 2026 remains surgery, radiation, temozolomide, and TTFields in appropriate patients. New treatments are promising, but most are still in the research phase. Learn your molecular diagnosis, ask about clinical-trial options at the beginning of treatment, and view symptom management as an integral part of treatment.

Transparency note
  • This article was prepared in October 2026; our earlier article with the same title was rewritten from the beginning and expanded.
  • Figures concerning standard treatment were taken from phase 3 studies published in peer-reviewed journals. The TRIDENT results are based on the company's June 2026 announcement and news sources, the NRG BN001 proton results on the ASTRO 2025 presentation, the dual-target CAR-T results on the ASCO 2026 abstract, and the GammaTile GESTALT results on the ASCO 2026 presentation; these may not yet have been published as full articles.
  • The application status of DCVax-L is based on company announcements and financial reports; the MHRA's decision had not been announced as of the date this article was prepared.
  • The frequency of glioblastoma and survival rates were obtained from U.S. cancer registries (CBTRUS); current survival data for Türkiye could not be found.
  • Comparisons in the graphics come from different studies and cannot be compared directly. The illustrations have been simplified. The Academy commentary is our own.
  • This article is not medical advice; treatment decisions should be made by the team familiar with your patient.

References

  1. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol 2021;23:1231-1251. doi:10.1093/neuonc/noab106
  2. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005;352:987-996. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043330
  3. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:459-466. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7
  4. Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, et al. MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005;352:997-1003. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043331
  5. Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner A, et al. Effect of tumor-treating fields plus maintenance temozolomide vs maintenance temozolomide alone on survival in patients with glioblastoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;318:2306-2316. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.18718
  6. Herrlinger U, Tzaridis T, Mack F, et al. Lomustine-temozolomide combination therapy versus standard temozolomide therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CeTeG/NOA-09): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2019;393:678-688. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31791-4
  7. Perry JR, Laperriere N, O'Callaghan CJ, et al. Short-course radiation plus temozolomide in elderly patients with glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1027-1037. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1611977
  8. Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T, et al. Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 2006;7:392-401. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70665-9
  9. Wick W, Gorlia T, Bendszus M, et al. Lomustine and bevacizumab in progressive glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1954-1963. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1707358
  10. Lombardi G, De Salvo GL, Brandes AA, et al. Regorafenib compared with lomustine in patients with relapsed glioblastoma (REGOMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019;20:110-119. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30675-2
  11. Reardon DA, Brandes AA, Omuro A, et al. Effect of nivolumab vs bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: the CheckMate 143 phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2020;6:1003-1010. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1024
  12. Omuro A, Brandes AA, Carpentier AF, et al. Radiotherapy combined with nivolumab or temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma with unmethylated MGMT promoter: an international randomized phase III trial. Neuro Oncol 2023;25:123-134. doi:10.1093/neuonc/noac099
  13. Liau LM, Ashkan K, Brem S, et al. Association of autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccination with extension of survival among patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 3 prospective externally controlled cohort trial. JAMA Oncol 2023;9:112-121. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5370
  14. Choi BD, Gerstner ER, Frigault MJ, et al. Intraventricular CARv3-TEAM-E T cells in recurrent glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2024;390:1290-1298. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2314390
  15. Bagley SJ, Logun M, Fraietta JA, et al. Intrathecal bivalent CAR T cells targeting EGFR and IL13Rα2 in recurrent glioblastoma: phase 1 trial interim results. Nat Med 2024;30:1320-1329. doi:10.1038/s41591-024-02893-z
  16. The ASCO Post. Bivalent CAR T-cell therapy shows durable activity and manageable safety in recurrent glioblastoma. 25 October 2026. ascopost.com
  17. Todo T, Ito H, Ino Y, et al. Intratumoral oncolytic herpes virus G47Δ for residual or recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 2 trial. Nat Med 2022;28:1630-1639. doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01897-x
  18. Novocure. Topline data from the phase 3 TRIDENT trial. 18 June 2026. businesswire.com; Targeted Oncology report, 28 June 2026. targetedonc.com
  19. The ASCO Post. Dose-intensified proton therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (NRG BN001). October 2025. ascopost.com
  20. Brown University Health. Press release on the GESTALT study (GammaTile). August 2026. brownhealth.org
  21. ClinicalTrials.gov. The SONOBIRD study comparing carboplatin with standard chemotherapy using SonoCloud-9 (NCT05902169). clinicaltrials.gov
  22. CBTRUS. Glioblastoma Awareness Day 2026 information sheet. July 2026. cbtrus.org
DROZDOGAN AI

Explore this article together

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

DROZDOGAN AI

Drozdogan Assistant

The Latest Advances in the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM), a Brain Tumor

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

Conversation and privacy information

Drozdogan Assistant answers this conversation. Authorized site administrators may review it for quality. Do not share personal information.

Replies use OpenAI infrastructure. Questions and replies are processed by that service; conversation records are stored on our site. Do not share identifying, contact or personal health information.

0 / 1000

For information only; no personal diagnosis or treatment advice.

Related articles

Explore other articles on this topic.

Stay informed

Receive new articles and scientific updates by email.

Google Analytics runs on public pages independently of this window and may use analytics cookies. Your choice here controls external services only.

Cookie policy