Skip to content
Prof. Dr. Mustafa Özdoğan · Medical Oncologist

Is Non-Surgical Treatment Possible for Stomach Cancer? 62.5% Complete Response with Dostarlimab

Is Non-Surgical Treatment Possible for Stomach Cancer? 62.5% Complete Response with Dostarlimab
In this article

Treating Without Removing the Stomach? Dostarlimab "Watch-and-Wait" in dMMR/MSI-H Gastric and Gastro-oesophageal Cancer

After non-surgical treatment with dostarlimab in rectal cancer, the same approach has now been tested systematically for the first time in gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. In the first interim analysis of the phase 2 GERCOR-GONO DEWI study, presented on October 23, 2026 at the ESMO Congress in Madrid, the tumor disappeared clinically at one year in 15 of 24 patients (62.5%) with localized mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) disease treated with dostarlimab alone, and these patients did not undergo surgery. In a later analysis, the rate reached 67.4% in 43 patients. However, the results are early, and both the definition of complete response and the optimal treatment duration remain to be established. We have previously covered the approval of dostarlimab in dMMR rectal cancer and ESMO's 2026 gastro-oesophageal cancer guideline.

62.5%clinical complete response at one year in 15 of 24 patients, no surgery
67.4%clinical complete response in 29 of 43 patients in the later analysis
0recurrences in complete responders (median follow-up 14.1 months)
21%grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events
Quick Answer · Physician Summary
  • What was found: In localized dMMR/MSI-H gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, dostarlimab alone achieved a clinical complete response (cCR) at one year in 15 of 24 patients (62.5%), who avoided surgery; the interim analysis target (at least 8 patients) was exceeded.
  • Durability: At a median follow-up of 14.1 months, there was no recurrence and no loss of life among patients with a cCR at one year. All patients with a complete response at month 12 already had a response at month 6.
  • The cost: Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 21% of patients. Of the 9 patients who did not respond and underwent surgery, 4 developed a fistula, and one patient was lost due to a post-operative complication.
  • In practice: Phase 2 interim result; not standard of care. A promising option, within a clinical trial, for dMMR/MSI-H patients who are older, have comorbidities or are at high surgical risk. The current standard remains surgery combined with systemic therapy.

Why does this matter?

Gastric cancer is common in Türkiye and is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. For localized disease, the standard treatment is removal of all or part of the stomach (gastrectomy) together with chemotherapy before and after surgery. This operation has a marked impact on quality of life: weight loss, eating difficulties, vitamin deficiencies and, particularly in older patients, a risk of serious complications.

In about 5–10% of gastric cancers, the tumor's DNA repair system is defective (dMMR/MSI-H). Because these tumors carry a large number of mutations, they are "visible" to the immune system and respond exceptionally well to immunotherapy, while deriving less benefit from conventional chemotherapy. dMMR/MSI-H was one of the first biomarkers to receive a tumor-agnostic approval, and this biology has also changed the role of immunotherapy in colon cancer. In rectal cancer patients with the same biology, dostarlimab has made it possible for the tumor to disappear completely and for surgery to be avoided. The DEWI study asks whether this "organ preservation" approach also applies to the stomach.

Is this the first time non-surgical treatment has been tried in dMMR/MSI-H tumors?

In the rectum, no; in the stomach, largely yes:

  • 2022: In the US, the tumor disappeared clinically in all of the first 12 patients with dMMR locally advanced rectal cancer treated with dostarlimab, and none required surgery (NEJM).
  • 2023: In GERCOR's NEONIPIGA study in localized dMMR/MSI-H gastric cancer, pre-operative nivolumab + ipilimumab produced a pathological complete response (pCR) in 58.6% of patients who underwent surgery; however, all patients had surgery.
  • 2026: Dostarlimab received accelerated approval in the US for localized dMMR rectal cancer (AZUR-1).
  • October 2026: DEWI presented its results as one of the first studies to systematically follow gastric cancer patients who respond to immunotherapy without surgery.
  • Not yet available: A randomized trial comparing watch-and-wait with surgery in the stomach, and long-term (5-year) results.

What is watch-and-wait in dMMR/MSI-H gastric cancer?

Watch-and-wait means that patients whose tumor has completely disappeared on endoscopy, biopsy and imaging after immunotherapy (clinical complete response) do not undergo surgery and are instead monitored with regular check-ups. In the DEWI study, about two-thirds of patients with localized dMMR/MSI-H gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer treated with dostarlimab achieved a clinical complete response at one year and avoided surgery.

How was the DEWI study conducted?

Feature Details
Design Phase 2, single-arm, adaptive treatment strategy; French GERCOR and Italian GONO groups
Patients Localized (non-metastatic) dMMR/MSI-H gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma; 60 patients planned
Treatment Dostarlimab; median total dose of 4,000 mg in the first 6 months. Continued for up to 24 weeks in responding patients
Assessment Endoscopy, biopsy and computed tomography at weeks 12 and 24; surgery if no clinical complete response
Definition of clinical complete response Complete response on endoscopy + tumor-free biopsies + normal CT scan
Primary endpoint Rate of clinical complete response without surgery at month 12
Interim analysis February 2026; first 25 patients completing 1 year of follow-up. Target: clinical complete response in at least 8 patients (33.3%)

Figure 1 · Adaptive treatment pathway in DEWI

Watch-and-wait or surgery, depending on response

localized dMMR/MSI-H gastric or gastro-oesophagealjunction adenocarcinoma: dostarlimab assessment at weeks 12 and 24endoscopy + biopsy + computed tomography clinical completeresponseno surgery;dostarlimab continuedfor up to 24 weeks no completeresponsesurgery(gastrectomy) close monitoringregular endoscopy, biopsy and CT
How to read it: All patients start on dostarlimab (top box) and are assessed with endoscopy, biopsy and CT at weeks 12 and 24 (second box). If there is a clinical complete response, they are monitored without surgery (bottom left, green); if not, they proceed to surgery (bottom right). Patients managed without surgery are followed with regular check-ups (bottom box).

Results

Of the 25 patients enrolled, one was withdrawn before starting treatment (because of pernicious anemia). Of the 24 patients who received dostarlimab, 23 reached the month-12 assessment, and 14 of them (61%) had a clinical complete response. After the interim analysis, one more patient achieved a clinical complete response at one year, bringing the overall rate to 15 of 24 patients (62.5%). Nine patients proceeded to surgery.

Figure 2 · One-year outcome in 24 patients

Each square represents one patient

clinical complete response at month 12 (14 patients)clinical complete response after month 12 (1 patient)no complete response, surgery (9 patients)
How to read it: Of the 24 patients who received dostarlimab, 15 were tumor-free at one year and did not have surgery (dark and light blue squares). Nine patients underwent surgery because they did not achieve a complete response (orange squares).

In a later analysis, a clinical complete response with the watch-and-wait approach was achieved in 29 of 43 patients (67.4%). All patients with a complete response at one year already had a response at month 6, meaning that responders become apparent early. At a median follow-up of 14.1 months, none of these patients had a recurrence or loss of life.

What was found in patients who had surgery?

Patients at one year and pathological response at surgery

Percent. Top bar: 24 patients treated with dostarlimab; bottom bar: Becker tumor regression grade in the 9 patients who had surgery.

24 patients treated with dostarlimab

62.5%
37.5%

9 patients who had surgery (pathology)

33%
67%
clinical complete response, monitored without surgerysurgeryTRG 2: 10–50% viable tumorTRG 3: more than 50% viable tumor

None of the patients who had surgery had a pathological complete response (TRG 1a).

None of the 9 patients who underwent surgery had a pathological complete response; in two-thirds, more than half of the tumor cells were viable. This suggests that patients in whom endoscopy and biopsy did not show a complete response were indeed non-responders or partial responders, in other words, that patient selection was largely accurate. One of the patients who had surgery developed distant metastases.

In the context of other studies

Complete response with immunotherapy in localized dMMR/MSI-H gastric cancer

Percent. Colored bars: DEWI (clinical complete response, no surgery); gray bar: NEONIPIGA (pathological complete response in patients who had surgery).

DEWI · interim analysis (24 patients)
62.5%
DEWI · later analysis (43 patients)
67.4%
NEONIPIGA · nivolumab + ipilimumab
58.6%

Clinical and pathological complete response are different measures. Comparisons across different studies are indirect; patient populations, prior treatments and follow-up differ.

In other immunotherapy studies in localized dMMR/MSI-H gastric cancer, pathological complete response rates after surgery of roughly 40–60% have been reported. In rectal cancer, clinical complete response rates reach 75–100%. The 62.5% clinical complete response rate in DEWI is promising for the stomach; however, how closely a clinical complete response matches a pathological complete response has not yet been proven in the stomach.

Safety

DEWI: safety

Percent. Red bars: adverse events and complications.

Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (24 patients)
20.8%
Fistula in patients who had surgery (9 patients)
44.4%

One patient who had surgery was lost due to fistula-related complications.

Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 5 of 24 patients (21%). The most striking finding was that 4 of the 9 patients who underwent surgery developed a fistula (a leak from the surgical suture line), and one patient was lost after surgery due to fistula-related complications. Whether surgery after immunotherapy carries a higher risk of complications needs to be evaluated in more patients.

How should the results be interpreted?

Strengths

  • One of the first studies to systematically test non-surgical monitoring in localized dMMR/MSI-H gastric cancer using predefined rules.
  • Clinical complete response was based on a strict definition combining endoscopy, biopsy and CT.
  • The interim analysis target was comfortably exceeded, and the rate rose further in the later analysis.
  • No recurrence has been seen so far in patients with a complete response at one year.

Points of caution

  • Small, early data: An interim analysis of 24 patients with a median follow-up of 14 months. In gastric cancer, most recurrences occur within the first 2–3 years; long-term reliability is not yet known.
  • No comparison: Single-arm study; although pathological complete response is strongly associated with long-term outcome in other cancers, survival was not compared with standard treatment (surgery + systemic therapy).
  • Definition of complete response: Tumor remaining in the deeper layers of the stomach wall or in the lymph nodes can be missed on endoscopic biopsy. A reliable monitoring method such as the one used in the rectum has not yet been established for the stomach; circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may not be sufficient to predict response in the stomach.
  • Treatment duration: Responders received dostarlimab for up to 24 weeks; whether this is sufficient or whether treatment should continue for up to 2 years is unknown.
  • Non-responders: Why some dMMR/MSI-H tumors do not respond, and whether adding a second immunotherapy (anti-CTLA-4) or chemotherapy helps, is unknown.
  • Surgical complications: The fistula rate was high among patients who proceeded to surgery.

What does this mean in practice?

  • MMR/MSI testing in every gastric cancer: In localized gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer, MMR (immunohistochemistry) or MSI should be tested on the biopsy sample before treatment is planned. This result can fundamentally change treatment.
  • If dMMR/MSI-H, consider immunotherapy first: Chemotherapy offers limited benefit in these patients; pre-operative immunotherapy options and clinical trials should be considered.
  • Watch-and-wait is not yet standard: DEWI is a phase 2 interim result. Non-surgical monitoring should be considered particularly in older patients, those in poor general condition or at high surgical risk, at experienced centers and preferably within a clinical trial.
  • A benefit even if surgery is needed: A good response to immunotherapy may allow a more limited operation and preservation of part of the stomach in some patients.
  • Close monitoring is essential: In patients managed without surgery, regular upper gastrointestinal examination and endoscopy, biopsy and imaging must not be missed.
  • Hereditary cause: Some dMMR tumors are associated with Lynch syndrome; genetic counseling is recommended, especially in young patients and when there is a family history of colon, uterine or gastric cancer.
The situation in Türkiye

MMR immunohistochemistry is widely available in pathology laboratories in Türkiye; requesting it routinely in localized gastric cancer is important. Dostarlimab's use in localized gastric cancer, whether pre-operatively or without surgery, is not covered by its license or by SGK (Turkish Social Security Institution) reimbursement; such use may only be possible with off-label approval. In advanced gastric cancer (immunotherapy in stage 4 gastric cancer), first-line immunotherapy can be used under certain conditions. Patients with localized dMMR/MSI-H gastric cancer should be evaluated by an experienced multidisciplinary team and, if needed, seek a second opinion.

Practical advice for patients and families

  • If you have been diagnosed with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer, ask whether your pathology report includes an MMR or MSI result.
  • If the result is dMMR/MSI-H, discuss immunotherapy options and clinical trials with your oncologist before surgery.
  • If non-surgical monitoring is recommended, do not miss follow-up endoscopies and CT scans; report new symptoms such as difficulty swallowing, bleeding or weight loss right away.
  • During immunotherapy, report side effects such as diarrhea, shortness of breath, skin rash or excessive fatigue without delay.
  • Pay attention to your nutrition; if you are losing weight, ask for nutritional support.
  • If relatives developed colon, uterine or gastric cancer at a young age, seek genetic counseling; also discuss H. pylori testing and treatment (can gastric cancer be prevented?; hereditary factors and H. pylori).

Frequently asked questions

Can gastric cancer be treated without surgery?
The standard treatment is still surgery combined with systemic therapy. However, in localized gastric cancer with defective DNA repair (dMMR/MSI-H), the tumor disappeared completely at one year in about two-thirds of patients who received dostarlimab in the DEWI study, and these patients did not undergo surgery. This approach is still experimental.
What does dMMR/MSI-H mean?
It indicates that the system that repairs DNA copying errors in tumor cells is defective. These tumors carry many mutations and respond very well to immunotherapy. It is found in about 5–10% of gastric cancers and can be detected with a simple stain on the pathology sample.
What happens if the disease comes back during watch-and-wait?
If recurrence is detected early in a patient monitored with regular endoscopy and imaging, surgery usually remains an option. In DEWI, no recurrence was seen at a median follow-up of 14 months in patients with a complete response at one year, but long-term data are not yet available.
Can dostarlimab be used for gastric cancer in Türkiye?
The use of dostarlimab in localized gastric cancer is not covered by its license or by SGK reimbursement; however, it may be possible with off-label approval or within a clinical trial.

Glossary

dMMR / MSI-H
DNA mismatch repair deficiency / microsatellite instability-high; a tumor feature that predicts response to immunotherapy.
Clinical complete response (cCR)
No detectable tumor on endoscopy, biopsy and imaging.
Pathological complete response (pCR)
Absence of viable tumor cells in the tissue removed at surgery.
Watch-and-wait
Monitoring with close check-ups, without surgery, in a patient who has achieved a clinical complete response.
Gastrectomy
Surgical removal of part or all of the stomach.
Becker tumor regression grade (TRG)
A pathology system that grades treatment response according to the proportion of viable tumor remaining in the surgical specimen.
Fistula
An abnormal leak or connection from the suture line after surgery or between organs.
Lynch syndrome
A hereditary condition that can give rise to dMMR tumors and increases the risk of colon, uterine, gastric and other cancers.

DROZDOGAN Academy Commentary

DEWI is the first serious signal that the "gastrectomy for every patient" paradigm may be open to question in dMMR/MSI-H gastric cancer. But the path from the rectum to the stomach may not be traveled with the same confidence.

⚡ Why it matters

Gastrectomy is a major operation with a lasting impact on quality of life. Being able to treat about two-thirds of patients while preserving the stomach could be a major gain, especially for older patients and those with comorbidities.

✅ Strengths

A predefined, adaptive strategy; a strict definition of complete response; the interim target clearly exceeded; and no recurrence so far in patients with a complete response.

⚠️ Limitations

A small, single-arm interim analysis with short follow-up. How well a clinical complete response in the stomach reflects true absence of tumor is unknown. The fistulas and one post-operative loss of life among patients who proceeded to surgery are notable.

🩺 In practice

Test for MMR/MSI routinely in localized gastric cancer. Review dMMR/MSI-H patients at a multidisciplinary tumor board for pre-operative immunotherapy and clinical trials. For now, discuss watch-and-wait for patients at high surgical risk, at experienced centers and with a close monitoring plan.

❓ Open questions

How can clinical complete response be defined more reliably in the stomach? How long should dostarlimab be given? Does adding anti-CTLA-4 or chemotherapy help non-responders? In the long term, is watch-and-wait as safe as surgery in terms of survival?

Bottom line: Organ preservation with dostarlimab in localized dMMR/MSI-H gastric cancer appears to be an achievable goal in selected patients. However, for this approach to become standard, more patients, longer follow-up and better response assessment methods are needed.

Transparency note
  • This article was prepared in October 2026.
  • The DEWI results are based on the ESMO Congress 2026 presentation (Abstract 2877RO), the presentation slide and ESMO's news summary; no full peer-reviewed publication is available yet, and the results may change.
  • Information on licensing and reimbursement in Türkiye reflects the general situation; the current status should be confirmed.
  • Chart 3 shows different studies together; this comparison is indirect. The other charts and infographics show data from the same study. The diagrams are derived from the text and contain no new data. The Academy commentary is our own.

References

  1. André T, et al. Watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy for dostarlimab in localized deficient dMMR/MSI-H gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA): results from the first interim analysis of the GERCOR-GONO DEWI phase II study. ESMO Congress 2026, Abstract 2877RO.
  2. ESMO. Selected patients with gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma benefit from a dostarlimab 'watch-and-wait' strategy. October 23, 2026. esmo.org
  3. André T, Tougeron D, Piessen G, et al. Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab and adjuvant nivolumab in localized deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: the GERCOR NEONIPIGA phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2023;41:255-265. PubMed
  4. Cercek A, Lumish M, Sinopoli J, et al. PD-1 blockade in mismatch repair-deficient, locally advanced rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2022;386:2363-2376. PubMed
  5. Smyth EC, Wotherspoon A, Peckitt C, et al. Mismatch repair deficiency, microsatellite instability, and survival: an exploratory analysis of the Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy (MAGIC) trial. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:1197-1203. PubMed
DROZDOGAN AI

Explore this article together

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

DROZDOGAN AI

Drozdogan Assistant

Is Non-Surgical Treatment Possible for Stomach Cancer? 62.5% Complete Response with Dostarlimab

Ask about the article and read answers alongside published sources from our site.

Conversation and privacy information

Drozdogan Assistant answers this conversation. Authorized site administrators may review it for quality. Do not share personal information.

Replies use OpenAI infrastructure. Questions and replies are processed by that service; conversation records are stored on our site. Do not share identifying, contact or personal health information.

0 / 1000

For information only; no personal diagnosis or treatment advice.

Related articles

Explore other articles on this topic.

Stay informed

Receive new articles and scientific updates by email.

Google Analytics runs on public pages independently of this window and may use analytics cookies. Your choice here controls external services only.

Cookie policy